Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
I doubt they ban all unrepentant sinners.

I have no doubt the church would ban anyone with drinking problem or that committing adultery. Softball players represent the church and, thus, should be good examples for the congregation.

And, it's a cheap shot to compare Baptists in general to Fred Phelps. That is the tactics liberals employ. Or do you want to plead ignorance on that one?

59 posted on 06/20/2010 4:53:26 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky
I have no doubt the church would ban anyone with drinking problem or that committing adultery. Softball players represent the church and, thus, should be good examples for the congregation.

So if Mark Sanford wants to play in a church league you think their response would be, "Get you gone, Fornicator! Thou shalt not play on our softball team." Somehow I don't think so. And in any case, what steps are they taking to prevent that from happening? They questioning everyone who wants to play?

And, it's a cheap shot to compare Baptists in general to Fred Phelps.

Why? Where is Fred's attitude towards homosexuals any different than this church's?

That is the tactics liberals employ. Or do you want to plead ignorance on that one?

So every person in the world who disagrees with you is a liberal?

61 posted on 06/21/2010 4:12:03 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky; Non-Sequitur
I doubt they ban all unrepentant sinners....

I have no doubt the church would ban anyone with drinking problem or that committing adultery. Softball players represent the church and, thus, should be good examples for the congregation.

Let me clear this up scripturally. As a Southern Baptist Pastor...this church has the potential (and I admit I do not know the facts) to be both right and wrong.

First...I agree with the first poster that it is unlikely they will ban all unrepentant sinners...but it is also unlikely they will know which guy out there is engaged in adultery or serial internet porn. The issue the woman is engaged in is a little more open. However...scripturally...this all rests on whether or not she confesses to be a Christian.

1Corinthians 5:11 - "But now I write to you not to associate with anyone named a brother, who is a fornicator, or covetous person, or an idolater, or abusive person, or a drunkard, or a swindler--not even to eat with such a person.(12)For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? (13)But those who are outside God will judge. Therefore "put away from yourselves the evil person."

The 5th chapter of 1st Corinthians is a great lesson for Christians living in sin. So...if this person (any person) is Christian...this Church is doing the right thing...even if they don't apply the lesson without prejudice.

Now...according to the SAME passage and the examples of Jesus...if this person is a "christian" (note the small "c"...meaning they are one of these I believe in god types...the earth is my mother and Jesus was a great fellow and I believe in him so I am a christian (so they really aren't)...then the Church is doing the absolutely WRONG thing according to the Scriptures.

"But those who are outside God will judge." We are not to judge those outside the Church. Period. Their problem is not their drug issue or homosexuality....but the fact they are without Christ. That is the Gospel.

Jesus ATE with sinners. Jesus associated...spent time with....hang around....SINNERS. The Church is certainly in the wrong if this person is just a random person who does not know better and they are doing this.

Jesus would have never done this. Paul would have never done this. Paul only enacted Church Discipline on those WITHIN the church. He NEVER enacted Church Discipline on those OUTSIDE the church because he was afraid of church people catching the cooties.

The self-righteousness of some church people astounds me. They want to be "fishers of men"...but they expect the fish to jump in the boat all filleted...gutted...and scaled...smelling like roses.

62 posted on 06/21/2010 5:13:06 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson