Thank you for posting. The article is interesting in that it (nearly) simultaneously follows two lines of thought. Very difficult to achieve, but the author does it well. It points out the fallacy of injecting 20th/21st century “social justice” ideas into the gospel, and the message that Christ’s justice is available to all.
Quite a good article.
I would also add that not enough distinction is made between how individual catholics make decision within an economic system catholics wish to establish.
For example if I describe myself as a “Capitalist”; it could have two disparate meanings.
1. It could mean that I make all my personal decisions entirely based on the greatest personal economic gain for myself. This can clearly be contradictory to church teachings.
2. It could also mean that I advocate for a free market system where my property rights are protected and I am free to make economic decisions based on any factors I choose. This in general is clearly consistent with church teaching, especially since history has shown that free markets produce the most wealth for the most people with the least poverty.
The marxist-liberal-democrats often exploit this ambiguity to claim that because of “social justice” capitalism is immoral.
A Catholic sensibility at the micro-level works wonderfully. In other words, a business owner caring about his employees and thier families and arranging pay, work and benefits accordingly. At the macro level, with government transfer payments, government “charity” is not charity, it is redistribution with jail as the consequence if you want to keep your own money rather than have the politicians distribute it to their favored groups and friends.
Good, thought-provoking article.
But you should have made it a caucus thread.
Ping to read later.
Actually, 15th-16th century Spain went down the drain economically because they couldn't figure out that adding a lot of money (gold from the New World) without adding corresponding wealth was a bad idea. So, it's really a case of "same as it ever was".
I’d like to hear your thoughts on this issue.
Because Jesus was a Socialist because He was concerned about the poor?
1:
CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1885 (249 bytes ) preview document matches
5 The principle of subsidiarity is opposed to all forms of collectivism. It sets limits for state intervention. It aims at harmonizing the relationships between individuals
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1885.htm 96%
2:
CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1894 (194 bytes ) preview document matches
4 In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, neither the state nor any larger society should substitute itself for the initiative and responsibility of individuals
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1894.htm 96%
3:
CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1883 (524 bytes ) preview document matches
freedom and initiative. The teaching of the Church has elaborated the principle of subsidiarity, according to which "a community of a higher order should not interfere
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1883.htm 95%
4:
CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2209 (367 bytes ) preview document matches
helping them and of supporting the institution of the family. Following the principle of subsidiarity, larger communities should take care not to usurp the family's
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2209.htm
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Perhaps the non-scarcity of hot air and vacuous thinking patterns lead some politicians and Church leaders to miss these important distinctions.