Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despite Legal Threats, Mexican Cardinal Refuses to Retract Condemnation of Homosexuality
LifeSite News ^ | 9/24/2010 | Matthew Cullinan Hoffman

Posted on 09/25/2010 11:05:41 AM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: markomalley

I guess God will be arrested for bias. He made it absolutely clear that men should not lie with men because doing so is an abomination.


21 posted on 09/25/2010 2:57:35 PM PDT by Mack Truck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

not just religious at all. I know many infact most who are not religious but find homosexuality disgusting and sick


22 posted on 09/25/2010 4:16:03 PM PDT by manc (He goes to church and now this biased media says look he's a Christian.Biased media =joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

The significance is that homosexuality precludes fellowship with God through faith in Christ. It grieves the Holy Spirit.

Accordingly, prevention of the communication of this religious facet denies a citizen of both free speech and free exercise of religion, substituting a pagan religion as a government established religion.


23 posted on 09/25/2010 5:06:23 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr; markomalley; little jeremiah

The condemnation of homosexual acts, homosexual “marriage,” and homosexual adoption, is a religious position, a philosophical position, and a political position. It is the latter two positions due to the Natural Law, which is knowable by reason, and independent of faith.

Furthermore, homosexual acts are contrary to the true nature of man, according to Natural Law.

You’re wrong. I’m right.


24 posted on 09/25/2010 11:04:31 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (Paladino is a rock star!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
Accordingly, prevention of the communication of this religious facet denies a citizen of both free speech and free exercise of religion, substituting a pagan religion as a government established religion.

I would substitute "secularism" for "pagan religion."

Our founding documents, namely, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, are based on Natural Law, which was created and given to man by God. What is the Mexican Constitution based on?

The Cardinal has the inalienable right, and the moral authority, to speak out against active homosexuality, no matter what the Mexican constitution says. I see that he invokes the Mexican Constitution's Freedom of Religion/Conscience "clause." Without a basis of inalienable rights and Natural Law, I don't know how far he's going to get with the Mexican Government.

He's very brave, and he needs our prayers. The Mexican government has had it in for the Catholic Church for nearly 200 years.

25 posted on 09/25/2010 11:55:39 PM PDT by Lauren BaRecall (Paladino is a rock star!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lauren BaRecall

Technically, the natural man has an old sin nature, which might have a proclivity to homosexuality. God provides a solution to every type of thinking and behavior the natural man is tempted to perform contrary to His Plan.

He shows us that those who are homosexuals, as well as liars, murderers, extortioners, etc will not inherit the Kingdom of God, but a way is available for salvation through Him. Hence the issue of homosexuality and how to avoid eternal consequences of such behavior is also a religious issue, in that religion, as a method for worshiping God, provides guidance on how to best avoid homosexuality.


26 posted on 09/26/2010 2:43:45 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lauren BaRecall; Cvengr

You are absolutely correct.

To say that objection to the homosexual agenda of which the basic foundation is the normalization homosexual acts is a religious position is as ridiculous as saying that objection to murder and its promotion is a religious position, since all religions in the world condemn murder.


27 posted on 09/26/2010 10:39:32 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
The condemnation of homosexuality is a religious position.

That may be true, but the actions of homosexuals affect the society at large; the spread of AIDS is the perfect example of that. If their push for 'civil rights' means that religious institutions that oppose their lifestyle choice are forced to accommodate homosexuals while providing services for the general public, then that is an infringement on the Church's ability to conduct its activities.

Even though the Church teaches against homosexual activity, she also teaches that people who choose that lifestyle be treated with all Christian charity, and not suffer discrimination simply because of that choice. That does not mean that homosexuals should have preferential treatment, just that they not be treated differently because of their choice.

28 posted on 09/26/2010 7:10:51 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Just because it is also a religious issue, doesn’t mean the law may not also address it. On the contrary, a law which requires the equivalence of homosexuality is also a law establishing the practice of a religion, which is antiChristian.


29 posted on 09/26/2010 8:11:14 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr; DBeers; little jeremiah

>>The condemnation of homosexuality is a religious position.

As well as a Darwinistic one. Celebration of what is clearly a Darwinistic defect is absurd from a Darwinistic perspective.


30 posted on 09/27/2010 5:07:49 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Maybe the Catholic Church needs to take a lesson from its past and get BACK into politics. Just learn "whose a** to kick" as Obama would say.


31 posted on 09/29/2010 9:05:18 PM PDT by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Glad to see there are still a few iron-spined men of God in the world.


32 posted on 09/29/2010 9:08:06 PM PDT by behzinlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson