What I saw simply assumes dispensationalism 'a priori' and then 'interprets' Scripture using the axiom that the initial assumption is true.
You have merely chopped Scripture into many pieces and declared that certain pieces no longer apply because you have assumed dispensationalism 'a priori'.
That's why you can't see that baptism is when the believer receives their priesthood.
And, when will you send the first Scripture to establish your position? Any Scripture you send will be based upon your a priori position that water baptism established priesthood.
May I ask whether you are a KJV Bible-believer?
If so, you will use the KJV to prove your position.
If not, why are you posting to this thread?