Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bible Translations, Profits and Politics
The Sacred Page ^ | 9/30/2010

Posted on 10/07/2010 8:20:07 AM PDT by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Cicero

I suggest both the NASB & ESV are as much or more concerned with accuracy than the RSV. The KJV was specifically translated to support a hierarchical church structure.


21 posted on 10/07/2010 2:07:11 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: utherdoul

“The Catholic bible is the only non-corrupted biblical text.”

No.


22 posted on 10/07/2010 2:07:57 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
The differences between Israeli Hebrew and Biblical Hebrew are: (1) tons of loanwords from European languages,

True -- but wouldn't this make it harder for someone conversant with Biblical Hebrew to read modern Hebrew, rather than the other way aroud?

(2) a pretty much complete abandonment of the Biblical Hebrew tense system and replacement with a modified tense system related to those of European languages and

True, and it takes some getting used to. OTOH, the Hebrew verb is really simple in terms of number of forms. Biblical Hebrew has a perfect tense, roughly corresponding to past, and an imperfect, roughly corresponding to future (except when they mean the opposite!). What serves as the present tense in modern Hebrew is originally a sort of participial form, which still also serves as a participle and sometimes a substantive. Biblical Hebrew is far more likely to attach an enclitic for the direct object to the verb, but it's not unknown in modern Hebrew, just sort of "highbrow" on the whole, as is the use of attached possessives.

(3) a replacement of Biblical Hebrew's paratactic sentence structure with far more relative clauses and a completely different word order, basically the same sentence structure as English.

Sort of -- much less pronounced a difference in modern scholarly or literary writing (not to mention poetry) than in general conversational usage. And I learned to avoid a lot of errors in sentence structure (and sequence of tenses) by hearing Israelis' mistakes in English, assuming (turns out correctly) that they were mentally translating from Hebrew.

I don't think it adds up to a "different" language, though there's room to differ. As in "When is a dialect a language?"

23 posted on 10/07/2010 2:35:03 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson