Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom; The Theophilus; bkaycee; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; Belteshazzar; blue-duncan
I believe Scripture because I believe God. The Roman Catholic church has little to do with it.

How do you knwo the scripture reflects what God had to say?

5,358 posted on 12/14/2010 5:53:03 AM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5063 | View Replies ]


To: annalex; Dr. Eckleburg; metmom
sorry, I don't have the ping-list
How do you know the scripture reflects what God had to say?

Initially it is Faith through regeneration by the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:14)

I can't speak for the garden variety Catholic, because Roman Catholicism is much like Islam in that it isn't strictly a denomination, rather it is more of a culture/life-style - IOW, you can be a Roman Catholic like Teddy Kennedy, John F'ing Kerry and Nazi Pelosi and still end-up burning in Hell for all eternity. For the non-Rome version of Christianity, you actually must believe the Scriptures and actually must have saving faith in Jesus Christ. To be saved, it is axiomatic that you believe the Scripture to be true, and to be saved one must first have the heart changed from stone to flesh where the Word of God is written on the heart, not left as "foolishness" on the page.

Again, this is one of the many remarkable differences between Roman Catholicism and true Christianity, belief in Scripture for the Roman is voluntary (though occasionally recommended) and it is to believed by authority of the Pope, so ultimately one must have unwavering faith in the authority of the Pope and his mistress "Holy Tradition". That is, you believe the Canon because the Pope told you that you must. Since this is a compulsory faith originating from whatever excommunication or vilification emanating from a political office in the Vatican is not spiritual in its foundation, it goes a very long way to explaining why Roman Catholics are fast and loose with Scripture and have no qualms about wresting it to weakly harmonize with some edict out of Rome or some popular opinion syncretized from a regional pagan religion.

Earlier I mentioned that it was "initial", for I can't possibly believe that a new convert can exhaustively fathom the depths of what little God has revealed of Himself to us. Yet, we have the benefit of apologetics to help ease us along intellectually, even popular forms such as Josh McDowell's "Liar, Lunatic or LORD" challenge. We have the vast confirming record of our LORD's works. What is the strongest evidence is prophecy fulfilled; for only the eternal Divine Alpha/Omega can declare the events of the future, with our LORD fulfilling hundreds of prophecies personally just by being born.

We can believe the Scriptures because they have been made alive in us via the Paraclete, are intellectually understood by apologetics, and are confirmed by eye witness and the testimony of fulfilled prophecy.

5,364 posted on 12/14/2010 6:45:30 AM PST by The Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5358 | View Replies ]

To: annalex; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; count-your-change; ...
How do you knwo the scripture reflects what God had to say?

How do you know that church tradition reflects what God had to say?

5,788 posted on 12/23/2010 11:27:04 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5358 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson