Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
“I explained how Luke 1:34 allows us to conclude that Mary did not intend to have sex with Joseph her husband following the marriage.”

Ummm...NO..... Mary says, “How shall be this since man not I am knowing”. (Luke 1:34)

“shall be” is the future and “not I am knowing” is present. Mary says she is not at the time she is speaking ‘knowing’ a man and says nothing about her intents or future. To conclude from her statement something otherwise is simply reading into it what one wants it to say.

5,466 posted on 12/16/2010 8:10:24 AM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5461 | View Replies ]


To: count-your-change
Mary says she is not at the time she is speaking ‘knowing’ a man and says nothing about her intents or future

Then her question is meaningless, because naturally women get to intimately know their husband in order to have children born to them.

5,968 posted on 12/27/2010 6:17:52 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5466 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson