[kosta50]

boatbums to NL: I'm wondering what "lie about the teaching of Rome" had come up when you first piped up on post #8? The original thread was about praising the Lord in song

The thread is an open thread, boatbums. Besides, if you read #8, it pretty much answers your question, so what's the point of it?

Even Gnostics and Mormons praise Jesus. Does that mean, one can not raise objections to that on an open thread? Change the thread to a reformed Caucus and pat each other on the back without interference. Ask RnMomof7 why she made it an open thread.

[boatbums]

I'm sure Natural Law is delighted that you are sticking up for him. My point is that the thread was started to not disparage any ones' religion but was speaking of a praise song that is sung in church. Notwithstanding drew first blood in posts 4&5 and Tribemike1 chimed in at #6 then Mr. Natural Law with his thoughts at post 8. Each one was critical of Luther, and the Reformation.

NL has taken many non-Catholic Christians to task for what he calls "trolling" on the Catholic threads in order to lie about their doctrines and disparage Catholics. He calls them haters and bigots, now they're "Pauliwogs" who bastardize the Bible. It seemed hypocritical for him to carry on so much about his beliefs being offended by posters who lie in wait with their evil motives and pounce at every opportunity they have. If such behavior is so repulsive to him, that he would turn around and do exactly the same thing is questionable.

I know the thread is open, but if you would look back on the path the posts took in an honest way, you would see that those who screamed and complain the loudest are guilty of exactly the same offense. NL response was that he was answering the lies about the teaching of Rome, and up to that point nothing of the kind had even occurred.