Posted on 11/16/2010 10:21:55 AM PST by pastorbillrandles
Did you know that the English-speaking world is in the midst of an Atheistic revival? It is fueled by a small but widely celebrated group of authors and thinkers who call themselves “the Brights”, and who lecture, debate and write best-selling books which have a wide following among young college and University students.
These are not your father’s atheists either. They are articulate, impassioned, and effective at the use of the media, and the internet. The “new Atheists” believe that the old atheists were too tolerant of religion, and not aggressive enough in their attacks upon it. To them, religion is not benign it is a retrograde evil which society can no longer afford to tolerate.
They also insist that one doesn’t need God to be moral, and in fact they posit that morality without a fear of punishment or hope of reward is purer and more virtuous than that which is motivated by religion. “Be good for goodness sake” was the slogan put on atheistic advertising on public transport in London England.
The danger to beware of is not their arguments, which are not much different from the worn out , long discredited talking points of everyone from Voltaire, Hume, Nietzsche, down to the bitter village atheist of yesteryear. All have been and hopefully will be rebutted by Christian apologists for this generation.
The reason I say we should beware of them, is twofold; first because of their suave packaging and sophisticated use of multi media and internet. These people come across like they know what they are talking about.
Secondly, to put it bluntly, the youth for the most part, are all too ill-equipped to think through these specious arguments, and are proving to be vulnerable to these modern sophists. Frankly, the decay in standards of education, the shift from Logos centered thought, antithesis,logic, facts and reason, to consensus and image based education has left many open to these attacks at the University.
Shockingly it is almost a fad for young people raised in traditional christian homes to “come out as atheists” at university, and there are websites and you tube videos that teach them how best to “break it to their parents”.
There are popular you tube videos such as “What if I’m Wrong”, in which young people rationalise that if their choice to become an Atheist turns out to be wrong, they would still reject the christian God on philosophical and moral grounds, marshalling accusations against the God of the Bible, such as His command to slaughter Canaanites, or his statutes against homosexuality.
More shockingly, there is a video “blasphemy challenge” , in which students are offered a DVD of the Atheistic ‘documentary’, called THE GOD WHO WASN’T THERE, to anyone who makes a DVD of themselves “deconverting”- specifically calling upon them to “renounce the Holy Spirit!
Here is the challenge from the website :
The Rational Response Squad is giving away 1001 DVDs of ”The God Who Wasn’t There” the hit documentary that the Los Angeles Times calls “provocative — to put it mildly.”
There’s only one catch: We want your soul.
It’s simple. You record a short message damning yourself to Hell, you upload it to YouTube, and then the Rational Response Squad will send you a free The God Who Wasn’t There DVD. It’s that easy.
INSTRUCTIONS:You may damn yourself to Hell however you would like, but somewhere in your video you must say this phrase: “I deny the Holy Spirit.”
Shocking, isn’t it? I am showing you this not to shock you but to alert you to the reality of the assault upon your children and the naive.
But furthermore I show this to also pull back the covers on the underlying spiritual essence of this movement. There is something more going on here tan just “free thought” and humanism. Here is the given reason for the specific instruction to “deny the Holy Spirit”, by the so-called “Rational Response squad”,
Why? Because, according to Mark 3:29 in the Holy Bible, “Whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; he is guilty of an eternal sin.” Jesus will forgive you for just about anything, but he won’t forgive you for denying the existence of the Holy Spirit. Ever. This is a one-way road you’re taking here.
The point is that this movement is spiritual in its essence. This is Satanic,it is an assault on the faith by the Father of lies, designed to blaspheme God and to damn souls. They have free rein on our campuses and places of higher learning. Unfortunately a good many young people are seeing these New Atheists as rock stars, they are emulating them mimicking their arguments, and renouncing their faith. Hopefully these reports will strengthen those who are tempted by this phenomenon, giving them arguments and the answers that have stood the test of countless similar attacks and accusations over the centuries. “Always be ready to give a reason for te hope you have in you with respect and gentleness”(I Peter 3:15) We will be looking next at the so-called “four Horsemen of the Atheistic revival, the Brights” as they call themselves, Christopher Hitchens , Sam Harris,Richard Dawkins, and the lesser known Daniel Dennit.
I agree, I was just quoting them- we are going to have to prepare to re-iterate that because there are going to be people who did what the “Rational Response team” challenged them to do, who will later be driven mad because of what they think they have done!
You almost have to believe in evolution to be an atheist, and everybody who’s been following the discussion over the last few decades knows by now that evolution is a bunch of bullshit. The biggest group of people proportionally who don’t believe in evolution is probably mathematicians and not Christians; the doctrine is not compatible with modern mathematics and probability theory.
Sorry PastorBill, I realise now that I sounded cross in my reply. I was annoyed with the “Brights”, not with you.
A humble bunch of jerks, aren't they?
Most atheists I've met were narcissists.
I’m sure that prenatal infanticide (abortion), euthanasia, sexual perversion, and pornography are perfectly moral to these atheistic mavens of morality.
That pretty much describes most religions too. One person's religion is another person's superstition.
“For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” 1 Corninthains 1:18
> INSTRUCTIONS:You may damn yourself to Hell however you
> would like, but somewhere in your video you must say this
> phrase: “I deny the Holy Spirit.”
Whether these self-acclaimed “brights” are wittingly or unwittingly satanic, they are satanic nonetheless.
There is an opposite (and positive) side to the new atheism and that is its potential adherents have to exercise a significant degree of introspection and critical thinking to accept fundamental arguments of the movement. That in itself will lead to much rejection and commitment to the alternative of belief. Even Hitchens recognizes there is another argument of some merit and in doing so, sounds sometimes more agnostic than atheist. The real problem is not so much the aggressiveness of the new atheism, but the lukewarm resolve of the millions who call themselves Christians.
There is nothing new under the sun.
Until Kingdom Come, there always have been, and always will be, threats to Christian faith. If atheists weren’t threatened by Christianity, we’d have to be doing something wrong.
Every knee will bow ... eventually.
SnakeDoc
It is quite compatible. It is mainly incompatible to those who do not understand probability. But the largest group of people who accept natural selection are probably Christians, since most don't have a problem with it.
Yes, it is the education of our young. Atheists like Lenin knew you had to destroy family so you can convince young women to hand over their young to daycares....all to mold the thinking of the children—get them away from the parent’s ideology.
Mothers need to understand the supreme importance of the formative years. The first seven years should never be handed over to strangers and godless people. Never! The Founders of the past—true geniuses—had a solid foundation in their home for their first seven years and NO formal “education” which is nothing more than indoctrination in public schools and to learn social conformity and collective thinking. For emotional stability young children need to NOT be separated from the people that love them in their first seven years.
“They also insist that one doesn’t need God to be moral”... said the homo
With the body of a lion and the head of a social worker...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.