Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Murphy; smvoice

It’s Christ’s body, not Mary’s body in the Eucharist, although it would take an extraordinary ignorance of biology not to see an obvious connection there. Particularly since the Holy Spirit has no body to give him, so Christ’s body was physically derived from the body of Mary alone.

And it may be a fine point, but we do not say Christ is present IN the “wafer” after the consecration. Rather, there is no more “wafer”. What is on the altar is 100% Christ and nothing else—the substance of the “wafer” is annihilated entirely and only its accidental characteristics remain.

Ugh..”wafer”. I hate even using that word in this context, it’s so disrespectful. At least call it “bread” if you can’t stoop to saying “Communion”.


10 posted on 11/17/2010 1:05:00 PM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Claud
I just read your post after I had posted mine.

And it may be a fine point, but we do not say Christ is present IN the “wafer” after the consecration. Rather, there is no more “wafer”. What is on the altar is 100% Christ and nothing else—the substance of the “wafer” is annihilated entirely and only its accidental characteristics remain.

THis does not seem to be an answer. This just explains what is done during the Eucharist. 100% Christ is 50% Mary.

12 posted on 11/17/2010 1:15:23 PM PST by smvoice (Defending the Indefensible: The Pride of a Pawn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Claud
Trust me, it will degenerate into “cracker” once some in this forum run out of ‘ideas’ and are cornered into having nothing to offer but insulting language.
16 posted on 11/17/2010 1:35:35 PM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson