[4mer Liberal]

I can can prove that an object with mass of x Grams subjected to an acceleration of y units of measure/sec2 will produce a quantifiable force of z units.... and I can accept by faith that mass was spoken into existence from nothing.

Evolution asks you to believe that life formed itself out of some primordial goo with no outside influence. Evolutionists accept this on faith, because they can't answer where life came from. And I am supposed to accept that as settled science? How do our approaches differ?

[allmendream]

Evolution has nothing to do with how life originated any more than gravity has to do with how mass originated.

I can prove that if you take ten colonies of bacteria and subject them to different stresses, you will make stress resistant bacterial strains for all ten different stresses you care to subject them to.

Am I supposed to accept as settled science that mass was spoken into existence from nothing? No. Because there is nothing scientific about such a position.