Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: The Theophilus
When you say that Dispensationalism is the only correct view of the prophesies, then you call 1800 years of Christendom wrong because Darby's folly never has been held, in any form, by the Church.

Again, by your undergraduate logic you should be Catholic.

Even without delving into interpreting all prophesy as future

Of course, we wouldn't want to begin a dialogue with the foundational issues; that would be silly. Lets just dismiss all the theology and move squarely to all the side issues.

Rather than continue this silly exchange ... I suggest you pick up the conversation that topcat and I started on this thread ... I suspect it could continue for several months. It is civil, contrite, and enjoyable. And we will get to the things you care about ... like literal sacrifices in the Millenium.

64 posted on 12/17/2010 4:49:01 AM PST by dartuser ("The difference between genius and stupidity is genius has limits.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: dartuser
Again, by your undergraduate logic you should be Catholic.

I am still waiting for you to say something that is more contemplative than a bumper-sticker. Face it, you can't defend the undefendable, you don't understand the doctrines, and my original assertion that Dispies are the least educated, and most ignorant of biblical doctrines is bolstered by your lack of substance.

Of course, we wouldn't want to begin a dialogue with the foundational issues; that would be silly.

Apparently you can't even handle "undergraduate logic" since you would prefer to hurl the elephant of assuming to be true what remains to be proven - that is, the futurist template applied to Biblical prophecy.

Lets just dismiss all the theology and move squarely to all the side issues.

Yes, the fundamental doctrines of the faith are "side issues" because we all know that identifying the anti-christ and who first pulls the trigger at Armageddon is far, far more important from the eternal perspective.

Rather than continue this silly exchange

It hasn't been an exchange, you have defended nothing, unable or unwilling to even work with foundational issues, and you even have the audacity of claiming that the doctrines of redemption and the atonement are "side issues". All you have been able to do is insult, denigrate and ignore.

I suggest you pick up the conversation that topcat and I started on this thread...It is civil, contrite, and enjoyable.

Unlike the bullying, rude and childish behavior you have exhibited here. Given what you have contributed so far, I don't think you have any interest or capability to participate in an honest discussion - especially about spiritual things.

But I do appreciate you demonstrating the accuracy of my statements.

65 posted on 12/17/2010 6:00:36 AM PST by The Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson