Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TEN REASONS WHY ISAIAH 53 CANNOT REFER TO ISRAEL
HopeInMessiah.org ^ | Compiled by Jonathan Sacks

Posted on 02/09/2011 9:48:44 AM PST by hope_dies_last

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
With the utmost respect for the beliefs held by one of the third largest religions in the world, that is Judaism, I am convinced that G-d is larger that the great religious divide, and trust the manifold wisdom of G-d in calling His sheep into one fold, that is the House of Israel and under the Lordship of Yeshua, in the lineage and Kingship of the House of David and according to the Priestlyhood in the Order of Melchizedic, Shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua haMashiach.
1 posted on 02/09/2011 9:48:50 AM PST by hope_dies_last
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last

I bet it was really talking about Lichtenstein!


2 posted on 02/09/2011 9:52:42 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last

Uh,what? Where are you getting this info?


3 posted on 02/09/2011 10:00:34 AM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Fear can hold you prisoner.Hope can set you free.(Shawshank Redemption))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last

Well, I am not clear on what the point is of his comments, because Christians say that Isaiah 53 is NOT about Israel, per se, but about Jesus Christ and the coming Messiah, and that these verses describe the Messiah and His suffering and death on the cross.

It also speaks volumes of how wrong so many paintings of “Jesus” are, most show him fairly handsome, while verse

Isa 53:2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, [there is] no beauty that we should desire him.

Speaks how he has no form or comliness, I.E., attractiveness, that he would be desireable

In other words, jesus was most likely rather plain looking, maybe even homely, to prove a point how we humans tend to promote or appoint as leaders those whoo look more handsome or muscular or fit


4 posted on 02/09/2011 10:01:01 AM PST by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blasater1960

Of interest, perhaps?


5 posted on 02/09/2011 10:01:48 AM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
In other words, jesus was most likely rather plain looking, maybe even homely, to prove a point how we humans tend to promote or appoint as leaders those whoo look more handsome or muscular or fit

Jesus would have to be physically very strong. He was a carpenter by trade, and with no power tools, He would need to have been able to do all of the things we associate with carpentry by hand.

Also, when Jesus cleansed the Temple, He would have had to have been strong, and quite possibly intimidating-looking, to successfully get away with flipping over tables and whipping the merchants and money changers therein.

6 posted on 02/09/2011 10:14:16 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last

I’ve never heard anyone say that Isaiah 53 referred to Israel. Hmmm.


7 posted on 02/09/2011 10:14:16 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last
With the utmost respect for the beliefs held by one of the third largest religions in the world, that is Judaism

3rd largest ... except for that dozen or so other religions that outnumber it....

8 posted on 02/09/2011 10:20:15 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
I’ve never heard anyone say that Isaiah 53 referred to Israel. Hmmm.

Judaism teaches this passage refers to the Jews or the Nation of Israel, while Christianity teaches this passage refers to Christ.


9 posted on 02/09/2011 10:21:39 AM PST by hope_dies_last
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN
Uh,what? Where are you getting this info?

Same answer I gave to cynicalbear...

Judaism teaches this passage refers to the Jews or the Nation of Israel, while Christianity teaches this passage refers to Christ.
10 posted on 02/09/2011 10:24:03 AM PST by hope_dies_last
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last

bookmarked.


11 posted on 02/09/2011 10:26:32 AM PST by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Hamlet 2 plays a musical number called “Rock me Rock me Rock me Sexy Jesus” that is a hilarious spoof on the “Chris Christopherson” image of our Savior as one fine dude!
12 posted on 02/09/2011 10:27:44 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last; CynicalBear
I’ve never heard anyone say that Isaiah 53 referred to Israel.

Jews say it all the time.

These are excellent rebuttals. Thanks, hope.

13 posted on 02/09/2011 10:37:37 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last

I didn’t realize that. Thanks.


14 posted on 02/09/2011 10:38:17 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN

>>Uh,what? Where are you getting this info?<<

I’m thinking the bible.

The rest is analysis of what the bible says.

However, I did not know of the timing of the “crazy talk” teaching that it was speaking of Israel.


15 posted on 02/09/2011 10:50:39 AM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Very much so!, thanks for the ping.


16 posted on 02/09/2011 11:20:11 AM PST by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Yes, so much for any claim to rigorous scholarship with THAT enormity!

Judaism isn’t even in the top 10!


17 posted on 02/09/2011 11:23:17 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last
Amen ! Brother.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach

18 posted on 02/09/2011 11:41:32 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

With the Holy Spirit behind you, how do you know the Money Changers didn’t just see a righteous angry man with a whip??


19 posted on 02/09/2011 4:06:51 PM PST by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hope_dies_last

These passages DO NOT refer to Jesus.The Christian Bible is a gross twisting around of the Torah!


20 posted on 02/10/2011 10:16:35 AM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Fear can hold you prisoner.Hope can set you free.(Shawshank Redemption))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson