Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What critics don't understand about testimony (REAL Mormon / LDS)
Mormon Times ^ | Michael R. Ash

Posted on 03/28/2011 7:12:57 PM PDT by Paragon Defender

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Scoutmaster

If I may, your post was spot on and you are not adding fuel to the fire, per se.

You may feel your message was “less polite” than intended, as is your prerogative, but I respectfully disagree.

Your well thought out, polite and appropriate message is a refreshing and much needed perspective.

Blessings,
SZ


61 posted on 03/29/2011 9:44:55 AM PDT by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis; All

You sure would fail at debate class.


I would be so hurt..... if I was here to debate.


Yes, it is kinda pointless for those who want an answer on Mormonism’s questionable doctrines out of the mouth of a mormon.


Not at all. The links I have provided address every “issue” or question that I have ever seen raised by the anti-Mormon gang here. Also, if you feel you have to have more direct interaction with a Mormon apologist, that is vailable at a few of the sites as well.

The question now is; Is that what you really want or is it just a game?


62 posted on 03/29/2011 10:01:08 AM PDT by Paragon Defender (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender; DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
"Disagreeing is one thing. What you and your anti-Mormon gang do goes well beyond disagreement."

Yet, when asked what would constitute "honest debate", you refuse to answer.

Why is that? Is it that you want to define the rules by which you will enjoin in "honest debate" or "disagreement"? Well then, answer the question; What would constitute "honest debate"

Or, as I believe, based on your refusal to answer. You don't want "honest debate" since it would only serve to open the flood gates even further. You would be obligated to do research and substantiate your claims and assertions. As it is, you can hide behind the "list-o-links"©.

To maintain a nebulous environment by which one can "float" around dodging any and all responsibility for failing to answer questions and the persitent ad-hominems.

Speaking of Ad-hominems, comparing one who disagrees with you to one of the Phelps gang? Epic fail as it demonstrates a complete lack of substance, civility and maturity.

63 posted on 03/29/2011 10:02:10 AM PDT by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

is it just propaganda when your beliefs are questioned?


Nope.

It is propaganda when my beliefs are misrepresented etc. I’ve said this dozens of times.


64 posted on 03/29/2011 10:06:22 AM PDT by Paragon Defender (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

Speaking of Ad-hominems, comparing one who disagrees with you to one of the Phelps gang? Epic fail as it demonstrates a complete lack of substance, civility and maturity.


The over the top response to the point of telling me to repent induced a raised eyebrow similar to when I hear a Westboro member going off so it made me wonder. So I asked.

And any of the anti-Mormon gang talking to anyone else about substance, civility and maturity is laughable.


65 posted on 03/29/2011 10:13:20 AM PDT by Paragon Defender (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender

Your failure to address even one aspect of the rest of my post answers my question.

Thank you.


Your “reply” is irrelevant, merely pointing it out so the persistent nature of your comments is visible to those who may not be familiar with your posting “style”.

Thanks for repeating it (bumping it) in your reply to me.


66 posted on 03/29/2011 10:20:06 AM PDT by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender

You are dodging again.


67 posted on 03/29/2011 10:32:37 AM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender
So where did I misrepresent any facts? Please point it out if you are going to call me propagandist.

Btw, I think it's so cute and quaint of you to label anything that you can't refute as propaganda. Just like the muzzies. lol

68 posted on 03/29/2011 10:38:55 AM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender
When Oliver Cowdery made his failed attempt at translating the plates the Lord told him: “Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me. But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.” (Doctrine and Covenants 9:7-8).

With all due respect, I have a question. If the Lord spoke with Oliver Cowdry about his attempts to translate the plates, why did he tell him to seek a burning in his bosom rather than just telling him? Wasn't he just speaking with him?
69 posted on 03/29/2011 10:40:59 AM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster
I don't see anything at all impolite about the tone of your post. The way I see it the tone of your post was just true, not only in its facts, but also in your expression of frustration at being called names for nothing more than respectfully asking for answers to legitimate factual questions.

I think your post is very powerful in its simplicity and honesty.

The palpable irony illustrated by your post is that you were simply doing what the Mormon article at the top of the thread, What Critics Don't Understand About Testimony states ought to be done. And for the use of your rational faculties at seeking the truth and getting at the facts what do you get? All you get is some name-calling by the Mormon apologist. That should tell you something. It is very revealing.

I hope your post stays put.

Cordially,

70 posted on 03/29/2011 10:56:51 AM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: Diamond; Scoutmaster
The palpable irony illustrated by your post is that you were simply doing what the Mormon article at the top of the thread, What Critics Don't Understand About Testimony states ought to be done. And for the use of your rational faculties at seeking the truth and getting at the facts what do you get? All you get is some name-calling by the Mormon apologist. That should tell you something. It is very revealing.

I hope your post stays put.

Well said!

72 posted on 03/29/2011 11:23:14 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (White House war strategy 2011: Sun Tzu meets Barney Fife..H/T Iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; All

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM THE MORMON CHURCH:

Burning Bosom® is a registered trademark of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, INC.

Any use of this term should follow the following guidelines:

1. Please do not use this in a plural sense, as in “burning bosoms”. We allow one bosom at a time to burn. Never more. Never less, unless you are an infidel (Christian) from a different church
2. Please do NOT link this trademark with other registered terms, as in “Mormonic Burning Bosoms”
3. Please always use the Registered Trademark symbol. We will fight to enforce our property, whether a shopping mall, luxury resort in Hawaii, or our intellectual property
4. Non-mormons are prohibited from using this term. It is only to be used for God’s True Church® - ie. Burning in the Bosom of members of the “Mormon Corporation”
5. Do not use this registered trademark in the form of a sentence, as in “Oh Baby! My bosoms are burning!” We want to show proper respect to the prophet, bless his toes.

With the help of every member, we can use this inspired term properly. When you report for Stake Cleaning Duty, please share these guidelines with others.

Thank you.

Chief Priest


73 posted on 03/29/2011 11:33:56 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; Scoutmaster; Diamond

I thought it was so good I copied it in case it doesn’t stay put.

And to Diamond, bump what you said!


74 posted on 03/29/2011 11:42:29 AM PDT by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster; Paragon Defender
Personally....I don't think your post was impolite at all.

I think you spoke frankly, and truthfully.

I say let you post stand....It may be instructional for some. Maybe even PD.

75 posted on 03/29/2011 12:06:37 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I knew what I was feeling, but what was I thinking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender
Nah sorry I don’t play pointless games.

ROFLOL!!! PD....!!! BBAAAAHHHHAAAAA!!!!!

Now that was funny!!!

76 posted on 03/29/2011 12:08:44 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I knew what I was feeling, but what was I thinking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; Paragon Defender

PDs desperation grows...

Rather funny really..


77 posted on 03/29/2011 12:19:47 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; Paragon Defender

PDs desperation grows...

Rather funny really..


78 posted on 03/29/2011 12:20:01 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Ha!!!


79 posted on 03/29/2011 12:20:28 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I knew what I was feeling, but what was I thinking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Paragon Defender

Meanwhile, back in reality...


80 posted on 03/29/2011 12:21:45 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson