“So, what is the answer when the process that thwarts the wicked in their tracks, so injures the innocent in his?”
Isn’t that the whole point of due process, so that the wicked and the innocent are sorted out?
Isn’t that the whole point of due process, so that the wicked and the innocent are sorted out? “ =========
You have answered my question with another question. I haven’t really a clue what “due process” means in the Church. That was my question. Maybe you could elaborate for me on the precise methodology of “sorting” it out. I’m left here still chasing my tail for the answer, realizing that what works in constitutional law and the courts of the US may not be exactly the same.
Civil authorities bring in people for questioning after reading rights, offering attorney, and charge individuals and set bail. Will that version of due process work in the Church as “due process”. I don’t think so.