Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: faucetman
I was just making the point that Latin mass is not biblical without interpreters.

The scripture you quote is not referring to the Latin Mass, but to glossolalia.

And we do have an interpreter: the Church of Christ herself interprets for us, and writes her interpretation down in a book called a "missal". Problem solved.

51 posted on 05/13/2011 1:01:08 PM PDT by Campion ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies when they become fashions." -- GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Campion
“The scripture you quote is not referring to the Latin Mass, but to glossolalia.”

Had to look that one up. It doesn't appear in my bible, nor yours I suspect.

It is always a question as to whether tongues is a reference to the spirit language or a foreign language or both. In some of the scripture quoted it was clearly referring to other languages. The point doesn't change whether you are speaking gibberish or French. If the population doesn't speak gibberish, French, or Latin, they aren't going to hear understand the gospel message are they?
Or is that not the purpose of your church?

55 posted on 05/13/2011 1:16:57 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson