To: sigzero
Is it stated in the Bible either way? Not really. Jesus's brothers and sisters could have come from Joesph's prior marriage.
Honestly, doesn't matter a whole lot to me.
7 posted on
05/31/2011 11:52:31 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: redgolum
>>Is it stated in the Bible either way? Not really. Jesus’s brothers and sisters could have come from Joesph’s prior marriage. <<
You should actually read the article.
8 posted on
05/31/2011 11:54:12 AM PDT by
RobRoy
(The US today: Revelation 18:4)
To: redgolum
If sex in marriage is sanctified and blessed by God... why would this same God deny a normal marriage to the mother of His son? The scriptures tell us plainly: Matthew 1:25: And he knew her not TILL she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. The word "till" is the operative word here... if Mary remained a perpetual virgin, "till" would NOT be necessary in the passage. That should end it for those who really want the truth, and not just be contrary. God bless!
18 posted on
05/31/2011 12:08:25 PM PDT by
FiddlePig
(truth is hard... lies are easy - http://redneckoblogger.blogspot.com)
To: redgolum
Whenever I hear THAT argument, I have to ask myself... When Joseph and Mary traveled to Bethlehem, how come I never see any mention about the REST of the family traveling with them? I am assuming that Joseph raised the kids, of course, since the mother died... Just wondering.
325 posted on
05/31/2011 7:36:03 PM PDT by
irishtenor
(Everything in moderation, however, too much whiskey is just enough... Mark Twain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson