Who the hell was 'president' while WE were being killed???
Posted on 06/01/2011 10:06:48 AM PDT by Colofornian
Judging from your comment, I highly doubt you were the one who hit the abuse button.
Seems the only way to hate mittens is because of his religion, never mind his slick, back stabbing wishy washy, flip flopping big government beliefs.
I guess those mean nothing, compared to his religion.
Better the devil you know?
I agree.
Who the hell was 'president' while WE were being killed???
I was in that boat......until he introduced us to Sarah. I pulled that lever for her and her alone.
When it comes to the Mormons, there is nothing BUT an ugly tone.
Not quite; as they tend to be VERY clannish and isolated from the rest of society.
Guess what!
The 'MORMON' scriptures call you a Son-of-Perdition and a babylonian whore!
“And he said unto me: Behold there are save two churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb of God (Mormons) and the other is the church of the devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth not to the church of the Lamb of God (The Mormon church) belongeth to that great church, which is the mother of abominations; and she is the whore of all the earth.” 1 Nephi 14:10
Just because they were wrong then, does not necessarily mean that they are wrong this time. Two entirely different religions, two entirely different men, two entirely different political environments, two entirely different social cultures,... The dissimilarities are probably more numerous than the similarities.
I smell sulfur!
Your preference has been noted.
So; you really do not care at ALL about the God(s) they serve or the condition of their eternal soul?
“mormon children lined up along the fence would be encouraged by thge mormon adeults to tease our children”
I hope other Freepers reading your comments do not come to the conclusion that this is ordinary behavior by Mormons...I don’t think it is ordinary Mormon behavior at all. In fact, in all my life, I have never seen such behavior, with one exception: when I was about 10 years old, there was a Catholic girl visiting her Mormon cousins who came to our Sunday School class, and one of the boys in the class made a derogatory comment about a Catholic doctrine (purgatory). I remember that I got angry at that boy as the Catholic girl started to cry...and his jerk-like behavior was roundly condemned by most of the rest of us in the class, as well as by the Sunday School teacher. My own experience is the opposite of yours, my daughter gets picked on by some from both sides (Evangelicals and Liberals) at her school. By Evangelicals for religious reasons, and by liberals because of her conservative pro-life beliefs and because the Mormon Church has taken a stand against gay marriage. The Mormon church building where my family attends is next door to a Presbyterian Church, and the pastor and bishop are on very good terms, and they even have an agreement to share each other’s parking lots when certain events cause parking lot overflow. I am very sorry to hear of your suffering at the hands of some very bad Mormons, I truly am; I don’t think most Mormons are like that.
Zakeet had mentioned: Temple Mormons such as Romney and Huntsman have prayed for the overthrow of the US Government as punishment for 19th century Mormon Persecution. Although the Temple Ceremony has changed since these gentlemen made their solemn oaths, they have never renounced the promises they made before their Mormon god.
I responded:
Very good post overall -- except I have a question related to this part above.
I believe, if I'm not mistaken, that the temple oaths to which you are referencing here were removed by the Lds "prophet" around 1926 or 1927. Mitt Romney was born in 1948.
I was under the impression the oaths were quietly dropped in the 1970's. Either way, you may recall that Joseph Smith proclaimed the original temple ceremony was directly ordained by Mormonism's god and could therefore never be altered, much like D&C Sec. 132 and the United Order could never be changed.
But, putting the question of whether or not Mitt prayed for the overthrow of the U.S. government in the middle of a celestial marriage sealing approximately four decades ago aside, there are many other issues raised by his blind allegiance to his Mormon faith. Consider the following:
It is not right to say religious doctrine doesn't matter at all. Take Islam, for instance. It would be dangerously naive to assume, as American civil religion does, that all religions are pretty much the same. It's true that most religions share core ethical teachings, but orthodox Islam also teaches unambiguously that there is to be no separation of religion and state, that non-Muslims are to live subservient under law to Muslims, and in some sects that Allah commands a jihad or "holy war" be waged against non-Muslim "infidels". To the extent that a Muslim wishes to preside over our pluralist liberal democracy, he will have had to break radically from his faith's fundamentals.
Liberals who insist that religion has no place at all in American politics have to account for the Christian roots of many social reforms. Consider for example the abolitionism and the civil rights movement. When faced with the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., and other black clergymen explicitly appealing to Christian scripture against Jim Crow, Southern segregationists groused that religion had no business in politics. You can't praise religion's role in political discourse only when it advances causes of which you approve or is practiced by constituencies blacks, say, that vote Democratic.
If God doesn't exist, then by what standard do we decide right from wrong? If a society recognizes no independent, transcendent guardian of the moral order, will it not, over time, lose its self-discipline and decline into barbarism? The eminent sociologist Philip Rieff, who was not a believer, said that man would either live in fear of God or would be condemned to live in fear of the evil in himself.
Mitt, himself, has placed his Mormon faith under scrutiny. In his famous speech on Mormonism, Mitt said that a person should not be rejected . . . because of his faith. His supporters say it is akin to rejecting a Barack Obama because he is black. But Obama was born black; Romney is a Mormon because he accepts the beliefs of the Mormon faith. This permits us, therefore, to make inferences about his judgment and character, good or bad.
Mitt has promised to fully obey Mormon teachings without hesitation and without question.
In his February 26, 1980 speech at BYU titled Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet, LDS President Ezra Taft Benson maintained the Mormon Church President spoke with inerrant authority on "any matter, temporal or spiritual " and was "not required to have any particular earthly training or credentials to speak on any subject or act on any matter at any time."Mitt either intended to honor his promises to follow another man's instructions, or he lied. In the case of the former, we are entitled to know where these directives lead, and in the alternative, we should be concerned about Mitt's honesty.As a Temple Mormon, Mormon Bishop and Stake President, Mitt has sworn among other things, he recognizes the President of the LDS Church as a "prophet, seer and revelator," and will "obey the rules, laws, and commandments of the gospel" as proclaimed by Mormon Prophets.
Mitt made these solemn vows with the understanding they effect "time and all eternity."
For these reasons, among others, I assert Mitt’s beliefs are indeed a legitimate issue for determining his qualifications for elected public office.
“Not quite; as they tend to be VERY clannish and isolated from the rest of society.”
This just hasn’t been my experience. Most of our friends are not Mormon. All of the friends that my son and daughter hang out with are not Mormon.
Watch this video on www.youtube.com| …and I'm a MormonWife, mother, and Mayor. My name is Mia Love, and I'm a Mormon. YouTube.com/Mormon |
I wasn’t going to vote till Sarah was picked, either.
"You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind.
The first man that committed the odious crime of killing one of his brethren will be cursed the longest of any one of the children of Adam. Cain slew his brother. Cain might have been killed, and that would have put a termination to that line of human beings.
This was not to be, and the Lord put a mark upon him, which is the flat nose and black skin. Trace mankind down to after the flood, and then another curse is pronounced upon the same race--that they should be the 'servant of servants', and they will be, until that curse is removed."
Brigham Young-President and second 'Prophet' of the Mormon Church, 1844-1877- Extract from Journal of Discourses.
Here are two examples from their 'other testament', the Book of Mormon.
2 Nephi 5: 21 'And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people, the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them.'
Alma 3: 6 'And the skins of the Lamanites were dark, according to the mark which was set upon their fathers, which was a curse upon them because of their transgression and their rebellion against their brethren, who consisted of Nephi, Jacob and Joseph, and Sam, who were just and holy men.'
August 27, 1954 in an address at Brigham Young University (BYU), Mormon Elder, Mark E Peterson, in speaking to a convention of teachers of religion at the college level, said: "He is not just seeking the opportunity of sitting down in a cafe where white people eat. He isn't just trying to ride on the same streetcar or the same Pullman car with white people. It isn't that he just desires to go to the same theater as the white people. From this, and other interviews I have read, it appears that the Negro seeks absorption with the white race. He will not be satisfied until he achieves it by intermarriage." "That is his objective and we must face it. We must not allow our feelings to carry us away, nor must we feel so sorry for Negroes that we will open our arms and embrace them with everything we have. Remember the little statement that we used to say about sin, 'First we pity, then endure, then embrace'...." (Rosa Parks would have probably told Petersen under which wheel of the bus he should go sit.)
1967, (then) Mormon President Ezra Taft Benson "The Communist program for revolution in America has been in progress for many years and is far advanced. First of all, we must not place the blame upon Negroes. They are merely the unfortunate group that has been selected by professional Communist agitators to be used as the primary source of cannon fodder."
We are told that on June 8, 1978, it was 'revealed' to the then president, Spencer Kimball, that people of color could now gain entry into the priesthood. According to the church, Kimball spent many long hours petitioning God, begging him to give worthy black people the priesthood. God finally relented.
"The discussion on civil rights, especially over the last 20 years, has drawn some very sharp lines. It has blinded the thinking of some of our own people, I believe. They have allowed their political affiliations to color their thinking to some extent.I think I have read enough to give you an idea of what the Negro is after."
said,
Sometime before the 'revelation' came to chief 'Prophet' Spencer Kimball in June 1978, General Authority, Bruce R McConkie had said:
"The Blacks are denied the Priesthood; under no circumstances can they hold this delegation of authority from the Almighty.
The Negroes are not equal with other races where the receipt of certain blessings are concerned, particularly the priesthood and the temple blessings that flow there from, but this inequality is not of man's origin, it is the Lord's doings."
(Mormon Doctrine, pp. 526-527).
When Mormon 'Apostle' Mark E Petersen spoke on 'Race Problems- As they affect the Church' at the BYU campus in 1954, the following was also said:
"...if the negro accepts the gospel with real, sincere faith, and is really converted, to give him the blessings of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost, he can and will enter the celestial kingdom. He will go there as a servant, but he will get celestial glory."
When Mormon 'Prophet' and second President of the Church, Brigham Young, spoke in 1863 the following was also said:
"Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God is death on the spot. This will always be so."
(Journal of Discourses, Vo. 10, p. 110)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.