i’ll concede that Rand is wrong on some things also.
and i’ll admit my ignorance of Rand’s specific philosophy.
but, i know my Bible fairly well. and i’d like to hear the author give specifics where it’s Satanic. instead of generalized statements slamming her, like that Government lawyer did today when he defended Obamacare.
and i know Rand was an atheist. so was Oriana Fallaci. and i certainly wouldn’t call her Satanic !!!
socialism and capitalism are basically opposite.
and yes, i know about early Christian communities.
but, i also know the Bible has many statements about the workman being worthy of his hire, and statements supporting that if you don’t work, you don’t eat.
in history, looking at results, i think there is no question, that socialism is much more “satanic” than Capitalism.
and, i have seen the progressives, liberals, and communists, try to “USE” our religion against us.
(like all the left wing churches promoting the global warming hoax... while NASA says the UHI effect alone is worth 8.0 degrees average, and the world has been COOLING overall, since 2003...)
and those same people who try to use quote our religion when it serves their purposes, are the SAME people, that CLOSE adoption centers, and fire medical workers, for following words from that exact same Bible...
The article relies upon conflating anti-Christianity with Satanism.
Yes, you are pretty accurate on that point...
If anything is “satanic,” it is the establishment of ecclesiastic authority, a praeterpolitical body that passes the collection plate at gunpoint for the gods of communism...
That is exactly what the author of the article advocates.