Is Romans I not in this guy’s Bible?
This is sad. This is why I choose to worship at a Bible believing, fundamental, evangelical Baptist Church. I often hear criticism from people saying this Baptists think they are the only ones going to Heaven. You can’t just cherry pick the portions of the Bible you want. The fundamentals of the Faith are just that. They are the foundation of Christianity. We are never saved because we belong to a club or congregation. It is simpler than that. We are saved if we ask Jesus to forgive us. He alone could pay the penalty for sin. He alone showed us what Love is. At the very least I could pay some respect and believe what He chose to reveal to us.
The Presbyterian Bible is only nine pages long.
Wow, I didn’t read further at the link, but if what was stated so far was considered by this guy as so very, very, very horrible, I’m wondering what planet he’s been on.
“Every biblical reference to homosexuality indicates it is not an ‘alternate life style,’ but gross sin,” one church member wrote on a church survey near the end of my tenure, following his grievance with a long list of Old and New Testament references. I got to see how the average church members interpreted Scriptures. But these complaints also became personal. “Our interim minister being an open homosexual has damaged our church and our ministry in the community,” one respondent wrote.
I’d never encountered these sentiments before in the seven churches where I served — from Boston to Raleigh — and I grieved deeply upon reading the words. In previous positions, I’d only known adulation and triumph,...
Nope, none of the epistles of Paul are. He was just a raving "homophobe" don't you know.
I'm always stunned by the way sodomites dismiss Paul and therefore dismiss about half of the New Testament.
He explains "hateful" blog posts this way in the article:
"Another post by 'Bobbi' listed a long line of Scriptural references that have nothing to do with our modern understanding of sexuality... "
Liberal “Christians” detest Paul.