Says the man who's willing to lie about what I posted by removing critical words from my quoted text. Thank you, that says a lot about the integrity of discussing anything with you...
And yet you still want government involvement after all - seriously confused I'd say.
SHOW ME WHERE. You can't, because I never said that. I said marriage is for the Church, and Government is out of the marriage business. Civil unions EXIST TODAY, and have existed for hundreds of years.
You want to twist my words and the Deceiver would? Go ahead - but the truth is here for all to read. It is your folly, and your false witness against me that is the failure here, not mine.
As already cited numerous times, your words do not match or have consistency.
You do not understand because you choose to not understand. You refuse to acknowledge the very words you quoted. You put pride for others ahead of the truth. That is simply not Christian at all. And yes, I just went there.
Can you admit that I was quite explicit in qualifying the elimination of marriage only in context with Government-sanctioning? Can you? Simple question - yes or no. If I get nothing else from this reply, either one of those words would tell me immensely about the type of person you are, in terms of posts on threads.
As was displayed- her statement was confirmed in three separate posts - so your bleat was out of order and as you did the previous post - proved further your errors.
One last time - GOVERNMENT RECOGNIZED. You have a mental block on those words? It was always quite clear, and only when people read what they wanted to read do they find something else.
The failure is on the reader's part; I don't know what else I can do. I can show you the words, but I cannot force you to read - you have to want to do that on your own.
Barring your ability to state one way or another that I clearly qualified my statement as GOVERNMENT-RECOGNIZED, I'll just assume you're not much more than a concern-troll who bounced to the aid of an online friend who got caught in their own error.
Yep, retread. Has to be.
Ah yes, stomping your feet and calling people liars. Well, that is a clear mark of a n00b - can't carry the argument, start making false accusations.
SHOW ME WHERE. You can't, because I never said that. I said marriage is for the Church, and Government is out of the marriage business. Civil unions EXIST TODAY, and have existed for hundreds of years.
civil unions - by definition are set up and acknowledged by government. Must be a mental block eh?
You put pride for others ahead of the truth. That is simply not Christian at all. And yes, I just went there.
Oh and mind reading too, hmmmm talk to me about Christian eh.
Barring your ability to state one way or another that I clearly qualified my statement as GOVERNMENT-RECOGNIZED, I'll just assume you're not much more than a concern-troll who bounced to the aid of an online friend who got caught in their own error.
If that was the case I would have responded to her ping instead of yours. Yet it was her observation that set you off n00b. Now apparently you need to thicken your skin. With your GREAT concern for our society you apparently want to strip ALL restraints, let a small group be "married" while the rest of society does everything and anything they want - through 'civil union' - oopsie, there's that gov't intervention angle again.