[Colofornian]

What I don't realize eh? Actually i realize and agree with all of that. Why do you assume I don't know or believe it?

See post #61.

If you did realize that, then you would have also realized that you were weighing in on who should be Smith's "prophetic" successors. You would therefore be in a posture to slap down Smith's bloodline as being his successors -- as you would have argued with me had I mentioned Joseph Smith III & his sons/grandsons as being a "continuation" of "prophets."

More minefield-stepping.

[Mount Athos]

If you did realize that, then you would have also realized that you were weighing in on who should be Smith's "prophetic" successors. You would therefore be in a posture to slap down Smith's bloodline as being his successors -- as you would have argued with me had I mentioned Joseph Smith III & his sons/grandsons as being a "continuation" of "prophets."

I don't see how any honest person could construe my comments this way.

If you scroll back, I explicitly agreed with a person who said all mormonism is bunk. So how can you argue I'm preferring one mormon group over another when I say they're all false?

It makes no sense. No I'm not playing favorites, they're all bunk. Well I guess I would play favorites in favoring Mormon groups that don't molest children