1 posted on
09/13/2011 7:00:09 PM PDT by
narses
To: narses
What would happen to that nut Williamson?
(As well as the biggest heretical and vile nut priests and bishops on the Vatican side of the breech... these things aren't just one way...)
2 posted on
09/13/2011 7:12:19 PM PDT by
Yossarian
("All the charm of Nixon. All the competency of Carter." - SF Chronicle comment post on Obama)
To: narses; Absolutely Nobama; Elendur; it_ürür; Bockscar; Mary Kochan; Bed_Zeppelin; YellowRoseofTx;
+
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
3 posted on
09/13/2011 7:13:18 PM PDT by
narses
("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions." Chesterton)
To: narses
The Vatican and SSPX recently concluded a series of talks on theological issues, designed to identity the points on which the SSPX questions the teachings of Vatican II. According to Le Figaro, the proposed agreement would state that the issues raised by the SSPX are not fundamental doctrines of the Church, and it is possible to question them without challenging the authority of Church teaching.
emphasis added
5 posted on
09/13/2011 7:26:00 PM PDT by
Dajjal
(Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
To: narses
Let’s hope and pray the SSPX will accept.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson