Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom
Besides, receiving by intinction gives one that bit of alcohol that kills germs. It’s not the “lipstick on the cup” deal.

Of course this is irrelevant. The Sacrament is the Body and Blood of our Lord God and Saviour Jesus Christ. Is it possible that during his earthly life when he healed lepers one could have ever believed that the next person he touched would be infected by cross-contamination? The suggestion would be beyond absurd frankly. The Lord's touch heals; it does not infect. The idea that the Body and Blood of God Almighty could be a disease vector is beyond impossible. Alcohol never enters into it.

15 posted on 11/04/2011 3:32:35 PM PDT by cothrige
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: cothrige

>>Of course this is irrelevant. <<

God gave me a brain. I use it. Christ is complete in the host. He isn’t splintered. No need to take a risk of infection.

>>Is it possible that during his earthly life when he healed lepers one could have ever believed that the next person he touched would be infected by cross-contamination? <<

I’m not really sure “one” knew about germs in Christ’s time. Perhaps Christ washed his hands. The Priest does.


18 posted on 11/04/2011 7:34:09 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson