Posted on 11/28/2011 3:27:18 PM PST by rzman21
On Private Confession and Absolution
Confession has not been abolished in our churches. For it is not customary to administer the body of Christ except to those who have been previously examined and absolved. The people are also most diligently taught concerning faith in the word of absolution, about which there was a great silence before now….Nevertheless, confession is retained among us both because of the great benefits of absolution and because of other advantages for consciences. (Augsburg Confession XXV [Kolb/Wengert 73:1-2; 75:13])
As a consequence of the vows I took to uphold the Scriptures and the proper interpretation of the Scriptures in the Lutheran Confessions, I am (re-)introducing Private Confession and Absolution here in Fisher. Why would I want to do that? Isn’t that just something Roman Catholics do?
Actually, Private Confession and Absolution is far older than the widespread, current practice of Corporate Confession that we have before most services. The current practice is more the result of a degeneration of Private Confession than a practice with good theological reasoning behind it. When fewer and fewer people came to give their confession and receive absolution, a corporate confessional service was held on Saturday or at some other time. I believe there was still an individual absolution, as is done occasionally among us on Ash Wednesday or Maundy Thursday. Eventually, it became what most of our congregations use now, immediately prior to the service.
Let’s start with the Scriptures.
Matthew 16:15-19: He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16Simon Peter replied, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
John 20:19-23: On the evening of that day, the first day of the week, the doors being locked where the disciples were for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood among them and said to them, “Peace be with you.” When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord. Jesus said to them again, “Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, even so I am sending you.” And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you withhold forgiveness from any, it is withheld.”
In both of these passages (see also Matthew 18:18), Jesus gives His apostles the responsibility and the obligation to forgive and withhold forgiveness. In the passage from Matthew, where Jesus directly addresses Peter as the representative of the other apostles, He calls them the “keys of the kingdom of heaven.” In the passage from John, Jesus comes to the disciples after His resurrection and gives them the Holy Spirit, and with that Gift, He gives the Keys. So we call the authority to forgive and retain sins the Office of the Keys.
In the Lutheran Confessions, there are multiple passages dealing with Confession and Absolution, but there are some passages that explain explicitly why the early evangelicals (Lutherans) held Private Confession and Absolution in high esteem and tried to restore it to a truly evangelical (focused on the Gospel of forgiveness in Christ) practice.
The Lutheran reformers did not see it as a purely “Roman” practice that should be abandoned, but as a practice obscured by the way that Rome practiced it. For example, in the Smalcald Articles, Luther wrote:
Confession worked like this: Each person had to enumerate all of his or her sins (which is impossible). This was a great torment. Whatever the person had forgotten was forgiven only on the condition that when it was remembered it still had to be confessed. Under these circumstances people could never know whether they had confessed perfectly enough or whether confession would ever end. At the same time, people were directed to their works and told that the more perfectly they confessed and the more ashamed they were and the more they degraded themselves before the priest, the sooner and better they would make satisfaction for their sin. For such humility would certainly earn the grace of God.
Here, too, there was neither faith nor Christ, and the power of the absolution was not explained to them. Rather, their comfort was based on the enumeration of sins and humiliation. It is not possible to recount here what torments, rascality, and idolatry such confession has produced. (Smalcald Articles III, 3 [Kolb/Wengert 315:19-20])
In response to this state of affairs, Luther wrote later in the Smalcald Articles, “Concerning Confession,”
Because absolution or the power of the keys is also a comfort and help against sin and a bad conscience and was instituted by Christ in the gospel, confession, or absolution, should by no means be allowed to fall into disuse in the church–especially for the sake of weak consciences and for the wild young people, so that they may be examined and instructed in Christian teaching….Because private absolution is derived from the office of the keys, we should not neglect it but value it highly, just as all the other offices of the Christian church. (Smalcald Articles III, 8 [Kolb/Wengert 321:1, 2])
Lutherans do not practice Private Confession and Absolution because forgiveness will not be granted without reciting all of one’s sins. Nor do we practice it because we want to make sure you do something to atone for your sin. Nor do we practice it primarily because of the confession. Absolution is the chief thing, and it is because God has given this great gift to the Church, that we want everyone to have access to it.
Private Confession and Absolution can be intimidating. It can be (and is) a fearful thing to confess private sins to someone else. It does not seem safe to be so exposed before your pastor. Yet it is nothing more than being exposed before God. The pastor usually sits sideways behind the railing of the chancel so that his ear is toward you. But do not think of the pastor’s ear as only the pastor’s. In reality, the pastor is bound by his vows to be the ear of God for you. He hears your confession and pronounces absolution as if (or, because) it is really Christ who absolves you through the pastor’s mouth. Further, when the pastor hears your confession, your sins are removed from you. God removes your sins as far as the east is from the west, and the pastor is obligated never to repeat what has been confessed to him.
Confession and absolution are really only an extension of your baptism. In the Large Catechism, Luther writes,
[W]hen we become Christians, the old creature daily decreases until finally destroyed. This is what it means truly to plunge into baptism and daily to come forth again….Here you see that baptism, both by its power and by its signification, comprehends also the third sacrament, formerly called penance, which is really nothing else than baptism. What is repentance but an earnest attack on the old creature and an entering into a new life? If you live in repentance, therefore, you are walking in baptism, which not only announces this new life but also produces, begins and exercises it. (Large Catechism IV [Kolb/Wengert 465-466:71-75])
“Thus a Christian life is nothing else than a daily baptism, begun once and continuing ever after.” (Kolb/Wengert 465:65)
Of confession, Luther writes,
So if there is a heart that feels its sin and desires comfort, it has here a sure refuge where it finds and hears God’s Word because through a human being God looses and absolves from sin….We urge you, however, to confess and express your needs, not for the purpose of performing a work but to hear what God wants to say to you. The Word or absolution, I say, is what you should concentrate on, magnifying and cherishing it as a great and wonderful treasure to be accepted with all praise and gratitude. …
Thus we teach what a wonderful, precious, comforting thing confession is, and we urge that such a precious blessing should not be despised, especially when we consider our great need. If you are a Christian, you need neither my compulsion nor the pope’s command at any point, but you will force yourself to go and ask me that you may share in it. However, if you despise it and proudly stay away from confession, then we must come to the conclusion that you are not a Christian and that you also ought not receive the sacrament [of the Altar]. For you despise what no Christian ought to despise, and you show thereby that you can have no forgiveness of sin. …
If you are a Christian, you should be glad to run more than a hundred miles for confession, not under compulsion but rather coming and compelling us to offer it. For here the compulsion must be reversed; we are the ones who must come under the command and you must come in freedom. We compel no one, but allow ourselves to be compelled, just as we are compelled to preach and administer the sacrament.
Therefore, when I exhort you to go to confession, I am doing nothing but exhorting you to be a Christian….For those who really want to be upright Christians and free from their sins, and who want to have a joyful conscience, truly hunger and thirst already. (Large Catechism, “A Brief Exhortation to Confession” [Kolb/Wengert 478-479:14, 22, 28, 30, 32])
So if you are burdened by a specific sin, compel me to give you the forgiveness of Christ. It is my burden and my joy to give you Christ’s absolution, just as it is to give you His Body and Blood and His Word in the sermon.
You may find the the rite for “Individual Confession and Absolution” in the new Lutheran Service Book on p. 292-293. If you have any further questions, you may comment here or talk to me in person.
Sola Meam! Me alone! That’s the real meaning of Sola Scriptura.
Saying there isn’t any authority higher than my own conscience is the essence of Sola Scriptura.
Luther taught that traditions could be kept as long as they didn’t overshadow the gospel.
He was far from being an iconoclast, and some Lutheran Churches today has statues.
http://ziondetroit.org/index.php?page=mass
There’s nothing Biblical about the radicals’ desire to destroy everything in their wake.
Luther taught that traditions could be kept as long as they didn’t overshadow the gospel.
He was far from being an iconoclast, and some Lutheran Churches today has statues.
http://ziondetroit.org/index.php?page=mass
There’s nothing Biblical about the radicals’ desire to destroy everything in their wake.
Luther taught that traditions could be kept as long as they didn’t overshadow the gospel.
He was far from being an iconoclast, and some Lutheran Churches today has statues.
http://ziondetroit.org/index.php?page=mass
There’s nothing Biblical about the radicals’ desire to destroy everything in their wake.
I should note, there were a few German Reformed folk too, mainly in and around the ancient University of Heidelberg. My point above was that Lutheranism did have a distinct German (and Scandinavian) ethnic connection—a parallel ethnic connection not found in other branches of Protestantism.
I never accused Luther of being an iconoclast—but I did acknowledge that the Reformed were. That is definitely a key difference.
I’ve visited some of the most important early Lutheran Churches in Germany...as well as important early Reformed Churches in Switzerland. The Lutheran churches are gorgeous—full of life and art—the Reformed churches are as plain and dark as tombs. Unfortunately, in both places in Europe today—both kinds of churches, are equally empty and void of life.
I was just saying. When I was a Lutheran and studied the confessions, they put me on the road to Catholicism.
I was just saying. When I was a Lutheran and studied the confessions, they put me on the road to Catholicism.
As long as you distinquish between the Reformed and the Radicals, I don't completely disagree. They were in fact, two very different groups.
Radical Protestants were convinced Rome had completely extinguished the gospel for centuries...therefore they looked to the Bible--not traditional Church practices--as the only model for reform. Since the bible doesn't really describe in any detail at all....New Testament worship patterns, it makes for very simple, spartan worship. In an effort to be faithful to the Bible, they completely threw out Catholic forms, and started from scratch.
While the Reformed didn't throw out EVERYTHING from the past in worship....their own iconoclasm made it look like it. The iconoclasm came from taking the 2nd Commandment ("Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image..." (Exod. 20:4)) very seriously.
Therefore you may indeed say they were wrong (and I agree), in interpreting that command, but you cannot say they had no biblical basis for their practice.
The Reformed were a marked departure from Luther. They began the process of transforming Protestantism from an effort to reform Catholicism into the creation of a new religion.
Scandinavia where my Protestant heritage stems from remained outwardly Catholic until about 100 years after Luther.
My great-grandfather’s parish church in Sweden was built in the 15th century, but it looks a heck of a lot more Catholic than a lot of modern Roman Catholic Churches.
Archbishop Laurentius Petri, the first Lutheran archbishop of Uppsala, departed from Luther in arguing for the sacrifice of the Mass.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Church_Lutheranism
I'm just as important as God - in fact I am God. That's the real meaning of Ex Cathedra.
“When I was a Lutheran and studied the confessions, they put me on the road to Catholicism.”
To me that’s a bit sad. A LOT of 1st & 2nd generation Lutherans (and Calvinists especially, actually, too) suffered and died defending:
A) Sola scriptura—the Formal cause of the Reformation, that Scripture alone is the sufficient and final authority for the Church. This doesn’t deny other authorities (such as tradition, or wise saints, past and present), contrary to modern evangelical understandings of the term, only that it is the only inerrant, and final authority, in all matters of faith and doctrine.
B) Sola fide—the Material cause of the Reformation, that by our faith alone—in the full and final work of Christ’ life, and death, do we have a foundation for good works, a changed life and Heaven itself. Faith combined with works does not equal justification....but rather an uncertain foundation (since I know my works are always faulty...). Faith in Jesus alone (not me) does bring about, justification + good works however....which is the good news of the Gospel.
Rome, since Trent (AD 1560s)—which cursed all Protestants who believed the above to eternal Hell—still explicitly, formally rejects those two principles...even if Vatican II put a happy face on it all.... Why I can never become a follower of Rome.
Nothing wrong with personal interpretation of scripture now that catholics aren’t allowed to burn you at the stake for it anymore.
That’s right, don’t read the Bible, don’t try to understand for yourself what it says, just do whatever your human-led institution tells you to do.
Besides that, RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, not Luther, or Lutheranism, allows for individual interpretation. All the first generation Protestants developed very well thought out and researched confessions....that had about 90%+ compatibility with Roman Catholic orthodoxy, (and about 98% compatibility with each other) and only included 2 groups: Lutheran and Reformed. There was no chaotic rush of “individual interpretation” as Romanists claim.
The chaous of modern denominations is just the result of RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.
Unless you are prepared to condemn RELIGIOUS FREEDOM which came about, eventually because of the Reformation—than you should appreciate it, because you too benefit from it.....
fascinating when pointed replies are given to your pointed attacks....your only responses are cartoons & pictures....basically attacking the messenger.
Mocking, not attacking. It is sad, but when people refuse to read or think, mocking is the next most reasonable answer.
AnalogReigns wrote:
“The iconoclasm came from taking the 2nd Commandment (”Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image...” (Exod. 20:4)) very seriously.”
Yes indeed, the Reformed take what they term “the 2nd Commandment” very seriously, and very erroneously! The proper way to understand the so-called 2nd Commandment is that it is really part of the 1st Commandment (the 2nd of its 3 parts - look at the text of Exodus 20). Also, it is not reiterated in the New Testament (as the 3rd Commandment is not either, much to the disappointment of 7th Day Adventists, Baptists, and Pentecostals). The reason for the ban on making an image of God for the people of the Old Testament is that any such image would inevitably be a product of the man’s own imagination of who and what God was, and thus lead not to but away from the promised Christ. The only one who could fashion such an image rightly would be God Himself, which He did with the incarnation of His only-begotten Son. (see Hebrews 1:3) Thus when Christians, no longer bound by the unreiterated commandment, fashion an image of the Christ, whether in print, painting, relief, statue or, as today, digital, they are not sinning, but confessing the truth that God became man in Christ Jesus, the one Mediator between God and man. The Reformed don’t get this, because they, on principle, do not understand that the chief teaching of the Holy Scriptures is not law, but gospel, the good news of salvation in Jesus Christ. Rather than being equal teachings, law and gospel, the law is condemning word of God that opens the heart and mind to hear and believe the chief teaching, i.e., the Gospel.
But the misunderstanding about the so-called 2nd Commandment is all about Christology. And Lutherans are very serious and exacting about Christology. All theology is, in the final analysis, Christology. (see John 1:14-18) This is also why the Lutherans highly prize the three ecumenical creeds and, as a result, find much to agree with both Rome and Constantinople about even though disagreeing in other things. Lutherans have never been iconoclasts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.