Replies

So all the species that are different or with different chromosome numbers all had to be on the Ark?

Gets way too crowded rather quickly.

But at least we FINALLY seem to have an actual objective definition of “kind”.

Ludicrous and idiotic - but at least you have a definition.

Plants easily developed populations with different chromosome numbers - that didn’t happen either overnight or over millions of years. Do you know and can you explain how it happens?

So all the species that are different or with different chromosome numbers all had to be on the Ark?

Please don't talk to me about the Ark (Tevah, actually) or Noah. I have not suggested that any such think actually happened.

You, however, must come up with some way to change chromosome numbers "gradually" or your whole "evolution" thing turns to $#i+.

Plants easily developed populations with different chromosome numbers - that didn’t happen either overnight or over millions of years.

And don't talk to me about plants. Plants are an entirely separate problem for you evos. Do you think animals evolved from plants, plants from animals, or was their evolution entirely separate? Your answer should be amusing.

I am quite aware of polyploidy among plants but this involve a doubling of chromosome numbers. You can do a lot of doubling and halving but you are never going to get from 20 to 21 or vice versa.

ML/NJ

Ludicrous and idiotic - but at least you have a definition.

So, let's review:

Virgin Birth: Real and reasonable.

God in the flesh being crucified and raised from the dead: Real and reasonable.

Following said God even though His chroniclers say he was descended from a fictional character: Real and reasonable.

Natural selection resulting in a new chromosome: Real and reasonable.

Noah's Ark: Ludicrous and idiotic.