Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change
To me the question seemed to be a means of plowing the ground to plant the idea that it might be possible to have a Christianity without the Bible, something I don’t think is possible.

I agree...The name Christian has been so watered down that it has practically lost its meaning...

There are however religions out that that do very nicely without the bible...And then we have those who don't rely on the scriptures but use random verses to add an air of legitimacy to their claim of Christian...

158 posted on 12/11/2011 5:02:56 AM PST by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Iscool
Perhaps the term, “nominal Christian” should be used more.

I understand your point (I think) about quoting random verses,i.e., something that is not really pertinent to the point the person is attempting to make.

Otherwise though quoting a single verse and showing its relevance seems quite proper and desirable at times. We stand in good company when doing so.

160 posted on 12/11/2011 7:15:48 AM PST by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson