[driftdiver]

“Thank you RM for your actions. Personal attacks are no substitute for sound arguments drift.”

Unless its bashing of someone posting something which happens to show a positive side of LDS. Instead of focusing on the content of the thread which is an alternate method of helping people to help themselves.

Nope, its post after post bashing LDS and the OP.

This method of charity happens to be Biblical and effective. Why not focus on that?

[Religion Moderator]

If the original poster had used the label "(ecumenical)" in the title, no antagonism at all would have been allowed on this thread.

Religion Forum threads are "open" by default, i.e. posters may argue for and against beliefs, dieties, authorities, etc - and they may ridicule on "open" RF threads. They are in a town square format and are therefore often contentious.

Posters who cannot handle that type of debate should IGNORE "open" RF threads altogether and instead read and post to threads labeled "prayer" "devotional" "caucus" or "ecumenical."

[Godzilla]

This method of charity happens to be Biblical and effective. Why not focus on that?

On what basis, show me where this "method" charity has to be earned or paid back according to the bible.

Or rather this is another mormon PR op.