Fr. Most is defending the party line by trying to square the circle. He admits that there is no right to error but overlooks the granting of such a right in the language of Dignitas Humanae and dominant interpretations of Dignitas Humanae (see post 111). Conversely, Fr. Most denies that a Catholic state has a right to suppress error by appeals to the irrelevant example of a Muslim confessional state and by ignoring the undeniable historic Church support for state suppression of error. Fr. Most places his own liberal bias above the traditional teaching of the Church.
Vatican II is written with in a vague, narrative style as to make it unclear. However, Paul 6 interpreted Vatican II to mean that the traditional confessional Catholic state was erroneous. This interpretation has been disastrous and must be reversed if the Church and Europe is ever to be restored.
So then would you endorse Leo X’s following statement against Luther?
33. That heretics be burned is against the will of the Spirit.
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo10/l10exdom.htm