To: SeekAndFind
I’d feel more confident if the researchers had been French or Swedish. Imagine, Italian scientists authenticating an Italian tourist attraction. That would never happen.Right? Still, the image is awe inspiring to me, and has been since I was first shown it by a parish priest in ‘61.
2 posted on
12/26/2011 2:51:17 PM PST by
xkaydet65
(IACTA ALEA EST!!!')
To: SeekAndFind
Sceptics have long claimed that the shroud is a medieval forgery, and radiocarbon testing conducted by laboratories in Oxford, Zurich and Arizona in 1988 appeared to back up the theory, suggesting that it dated from between 1260 and 1390.These test results were later disputed by one of the researchers who originally came up with the dates while trying to debunk an amateur couple who debunked his work.
4 posted on
12/26/2011 3:53:14 PM PST by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
To: SeekAndFind
From article:
"The scientists used extremely brief pulses of ultraviolet light to replicate the kind of marks found on the burial cloth.
5 posted on
12/26/2011 3:56:48 PM PST by
Talisker
(History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
To: SeekAndFind
No it’s not. Jews never buried people in the manner the shroud suggests.
To: SeekAndFind
Even if they date it back to the time of Christ, they can never prove that the image is that of Jesus Christ.
7 posted on
12/26/2011 4:26:04 PM PST by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson