“Fr. Haley is a lunatic.”
Back up or withdraw your detraction. You cite “Good Bye, Good Men” by Michael Rose, but this author is on record defending your “lunatic” Fr. Haley:
http://www.newoxfordreview.org/article.jsp?did=0305-rose
Fr. Haley was called as a witness to make a legal deposition. Here is a PDF of the legal deposition that brought the the hammer of Loverde:
http://www.rcf.org/pdfs/hdep.pdf
Unless you can find a lie in this deposition, you owe Fr. Haley an apology. Perhaps you would have prefer that Fr. Haley lie in his deposition.
I’m not sure how the New Oxford Review attaches Fr. Haley to what Michael Rose says in that article, but the (apparently reprinted) article is about James Gould, not Father Haley, and in it, Michael Rose reaffirms the excellent condition of Arlington Diocese under Bishop Keating, and the work for James Gould to prevent homosexual infiltration.
I am glad you presented the deposition; I am very curious whether the problem is that Haley made many assertions about other priests that were far beyond what he was depositioned to answer... but I have to leave for now.
I don’t know for certain that anything Fr. Haley said in the deposition is a lie, but he is plainly, knowingly entering into the public record the most salacious testimony I can imagine that has little to do with the subject at hand. Around page 140, he takes the slightest nudge from the depositioner about other signs of sexually inappropriate behavior he’s witnessed, and launches into very specific detail, naming names.