Image credit: David Middlecamp. Copyright © 2012 The Tribune. Adapted for use in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holders.
Posted on 01/27/2012 5:31:10 AM PST by fishtank
Fossil Whale Brain Proves Paleontologist Wrong
by Brian Thomas, M.S. | Jan. 27, 2012
Howell Thomas, senior paleontological preparator for the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, was skeptical when a woman claimed that she found a fossilized whale brain in San Luis Obispo County, California, nine years ago.
"The first thing I said when I heard about this finding was that there's just no way," Thomas told the Beatrice Daily Sun. "They brought it in, and sure enough, it's the second of two fossil whale brains [ever found]."1
He explained that "it's an amazing specimen because brains don't fossilize because of their soft tissue…. Soft tissue doesn't fossilize, and so the brain is the first thing that deteriorates. To create a situation where this could get fossilized is unheard of."1
Similarly, the San Luis Obispo Tribune reported, "Most fossils are of skeletons, and scientists did not think a mass of soft tissue like a brain could fossilize."2
But this is wrong. Soft tissues can fossilize a few ways, such as by forming impressions in rock, by being replaced by minerals that preserve the original soft tissue shape, and sometimes by a process resembling mummification of the original material.
The real reason why many paleontologists have such a difficult time interpreting soft tissue fossils is because their training tells them to believe that fossils took a long time to form and that they have been residing in earth materials for long spans of "geologic time." Either of these core doctrines works against the possibility of soft tissues still being present in such "ancient" specimens.
The woman who found the fossil in California, Pepper O'Shaughnessy, had been using it as a doorstop in her home. This suggests that the whale brain's soft tissue must have been replaced by mineral, making it heavy enough to hold the door and able to withstand rotting from exposure. But this is not the only example of spectacular Ice Age-deposited whale fossils found on the west coast of the Western Hemisphere, which are best explained as animals that were trapped in pools of water as the floodwaters retreated from the continents in the final stages of the Great Flood.3
In another fossil soft tissue example, a team of paleontologists tested the chemicals that caused red-colored patches in a mummified mosasaur. They published in 2010 their discovery of "hemoglobin decay fragments"4,5 and described the mosasaur's original tissue body scales from nose to tail. The Los Angeles museum where Howell Thomas works had kept the fossil, originally from Kansas, for four decades.
In addition, paleontologists have produced dozens of technical papers describing original tissue fossils, ranging from Ice Age plant tissues that are still green to dinosaur bone marrow with original blood vessels.6,7
After examining the presumably mineralized whale brain, Thomas said, "It just couldn't be anything else. It really is what we say it is."2 And the same is true of original soft tissue fossils that had not been mineralized—they couldn't be anything else, no matter how much of a challenge they present to the dogma of long ages of geologic time.
References
Koperski, S. A whale of a tale. Beatrice Daily Sun. Posted on beatricedailysun.com January 5, 2012, accessed January 13, 2012. Sneed, D. Whale of a find. San Louis Obispo Tribune. Posted on sanlouisobispo.com January 8, 2012, accessed January 13, 2012. Thomas, B. Whales in the Desert? ICR News. Posted on icr.org December 20, 2011, accessed January 17, 2012. Lindgren J. et al. 2010. Convergent Evolution in Aquatic Tetrapods: Insights from an Exceptional Fossil Mosasaur. PloS ONE. 5 (8): e11998. Some have suggested that the mosasaur tissue had been "phosphatized," which occurs when original soft tissues like proteins are replaced by phosphate mineral. Unlike original biological material, phosphatized material would be more likely to persist for millions of years. However, the technical paper reported original protein decay remnants, not phosphatized material, and the scientific journal has not issued any retraction. Fossil Analyses with Verified Original Soft Tissues. ICR Fact Sheet. Posted on icr.org July 21, 2011, accessed January 17, 2012. Fresh Tissues Show That Fossils Are Recent. ICR Fact Sheet Posted on icr.org, accessed January 17, 2012.
Image credit: David Middlecamp. Copyright © 2012 The Tribune. Adapted for use in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holders.
* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.
Article posted on January 27, 2012.
Image credit: David Middlecamp. Copyright © 2012 The Tribune. Adapted for use in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holders.
“There are two books laid before us to study,
to prevent our falling into error:
first, the volume of the Scriptures,
which reveal the will of God;
then the volume of the Creatures,
which express His power.” —
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626),
father of the scientific method
I think the Burgess shales contain many types of fossilized soft tissue.
Long seen on xradiograph and CTscans
in a fraction of the plated specimens.
Just like the so called science of global warming.... The ‘scientists’ spend all their time using a methodology to prop up their declared science. Darwin is so out and this ‘find’ is evidence.
I don’t get it. Someone discovers something new and this discredits science exactly how?
Bacon is half right (this is the only time you’ll ever hear me say anything against bacon).
I tell my boys that there are only two books required for this life. One is the Holy Bible and the other is the Ranger Handbook.
I don’t think fossilized whale brains fit in there anywhere.
Not only that, it’s very amateurishly written. Fossil casts of soft tissue do occur, and while rare, any fossil is rare. Scientists know that, so....what’s the point of this article?
Similarly, the San Luis Obispo Tribune reported, "Most fossils are of skeletons, and scientists did not think a mass of soft tissue like a brain could fossilize."2
How long has it been since paleontologists said that that soft tissue "can't" be fossilized? Very rare? yes, because the animal hast to be buried before it rots or is eaten, but with billions of animals dying every year for lots* of years, some are going to have soft tissue preserved.
*lots measured in thousands or hundreds of millions depending on whether you are a young earth creationist.
I think the ICR places a premium on quantity rather than quality. What's the old saying, if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with ...
"These various shales are of great importance in the reconstruction of the ecosystems immediately after the Cambrian explosion.
The taphonomic regime results in soft tissue being preserved, which means that organisms without hard parts that could be conventionally fossilised can be seen; also, we gain an insight into the organs of more familiar organisms such as the trilobites."
"The rock unit is a black shale, and crops out at a number of localities near the town of Field in Yoho National Park.
A Burgess Shale trilobite showing soft-part preservation:
The first complete Anomalocaris fossil found:
I am amazed that anyone could look at a hunk of rock and recognize it as a whale brain. “Oh, look dear, a whale brain. I’m taking it home for a door stop”.
“I think It’s a Wonderful Life by Stephen Jay Gould is about these Burgess Shale fossils.”
Doesn’t Jimmy Stewart star in that? I must dozed through the Burgess Shale fossils scene. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.