[bert]

The writer is clearly not an expert if he attacks the fictions and non existent group he labeled as Darwinist.

The term Darwinist is a straw man established to have a basis for promulgating dogma

[Eva]

I am not sure that is true. I am reading Jonah Goldberg's, Liberal Fascism, in which Jonah describes the Progressive view of the constitution as Darwinist, organic. In other words a living document that must evolve to survive. I haven't read the article, so I cannot address how the term is used in the article. If you haven't read, Liberal Fascism, I highly recommend it. The relevancy to the election issues is just stunning, especially the progressive goal of killing off individualism and personal achievement (leveling the playing field).