“What I asked was if he was condemned to Hell for acceptance of evolution and preferred nothingness to submission to our Lord.”
Spirited: The Pope is fallible, but his will is in submission to our Lord. Our Lord is bigger than our weaknesses. He does not judge as men do, for which we can be thankful.
Amd: I also wondered if you were capable of arguing against a scientific theory without condemning those who disagree with you to hell.
Spirited: Such questions are deceptive tactics with but one purpose: to shut down further discussion by casting shame upon the one questioned.
That is my response to you and your so-called question.
It is hardly a deceptive tactic for me to point out that it is a common argument of Creationists to claim that any who don't accept what they believe about the natural world....
doesn't believe the Bible
only “claims” to be a Christian
Prefers nothingness to submission to our Lord
And for such souls there is Hell.
Now why is it that so many Creationists cannot make an argument against a scientific theory without a blatant lie (as the author of this article started with) or attacking the religious beliefs of those who disagree with them and condemn them to hell?