1 posted on
03/05/2012 5:51:34 AM PST by
NYer
To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; SumProVita; ...
2 posted on
03/05/2012 5:52:10 AM PST by
NYer
(He who hides in his heart the remembrance of wrongs is like a man who feeds a snake on his chest. St)
To: NYer
Santorum needs to read Levin’s Ameritopia before he hops in the sack with More.
To: NYer
The leftists obviously believe the average citizen still worships JFK, like Chris Matthews. I don’t think so.
4 posted on
03/05/2012 5:56:50 AM PST by
skeeter
To: NYer
I love his principles. You know he is not a flip flopper. He is so refreshing. I am more and more excited about his delegate count tomorrow. He will make such a wonderful President. Hopefully most voters feel the same way. I know they feel that way in Tennessee, Oklahoma and Ohio.
5 posted on
03/05/2012 5:57:47 AM PST by
napscoordinator
(A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
To: NYer
Santorum has my vote and my family's vote. He is no hollow reed blowing in the winds of popularity. We desperately need a man of Judeo-Christian principles at the helm, any further down the funnel to hell and we'll be wholly destroyed.
6 posted on
03/05/2012 6:01:32 AM PST by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: NYer
When Madison spoke of a “perfect separation” between Church and State - was he also seeking to expel faith from public life?
Does Santorum truly believe Kennedy “advanced a philosophy of strict separation that would create a purely secular public square cleansed of all religious wisdom and the voice of religious people of all faiths”?
Or was Kennedy trying to say that it was OK for our nation to have the religious wisdom and the voice of religious people of the Catholic faith - without the White House taking orders from the Vatican?
What part of the vision that Kennedy put forth made Santorum want “to puke”? The part where the White House wouldn't be taking its orders from the Vatican? The part where Kennedy wouldn't be adopting his public policy positions based upon his religious faith?
16 posted on
03/05/2012 7:18:23 AM PST by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson