Well if you use “amenable” in the sense of someone willing to be pushed around, like Christians who take all kinds of insult against their faith and symbols, but keep allowing the Pelosis and Kennedys to accept the sacrament although they press abortions on all peoples, including making it a condition of our foreign policy and aide across the world. Obama personally intervened in Kenya as a sitting US Senator to force an abortion clause into Kenya’s constitution. The Vatican and its multitude has to go on the offense. Instead they allow Holder to list them as a “money laundering operation”. Geesh!
Sir or madam, from your two comments I take it that you do not link the doctrinal issues to the practical. But they are linked. Pelosi (correctly) cites Vatican II’s teaching on religious freedom to explain her abortion votes—we do not have any right as Catholics to infringe on another faith’s teachings (many define life and ‘ensoulment’ as beginning at birth, e.g. Jewish). Homosexuality is a right; all sin apparently are seen as rights, against which we Catholics may only form consciences, not draft legislation. This is all Vatican II and it is all that SSPX is struggling against. I think you might be a person active in the struggle and perhaps do not know anyone else who is active who has made the connection between the doctrine and the action. I wish we worked together! I could show you each time we run into a brick wall how it is related to decisions made at Vatican II that hamstrung us—that hamstring us now. We should never have given up our right to a religious state; it was our tool for Truth, even if we could never have achieved a Restoration.