Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ELCA Synod Calls LCMC Schismatic
ELCA Today ^ | 04/27/2012 | Dan Skogen

Posted on 04/28/2012 11:15:55 AM PDT by rhema

The ELCA's Southeastern Iowa Synod issued a statement in their weekly newsletter concerning the Southeastern Iowa Synod Council's removal of St. Mark's Lutheran church (Marion, IA) from the roster of ELCA congregations. Within the statement it says, "The congregation is being served by a pastor of LCMC, a church body considered to promote separation (schismatic) from the ELCA (see HERE )

This is interesting to me because firstly they openly claim that the LCMC promotes separation from the ELCA. What are the facts that support this allegation? The fact of the matter is that this congregation, which the synod took action against, is dual-affiliated with the ELCA and LCMC. The LCMC is fine with the dual-affiliation, yet the ELCA is not. Who here is promoting separation from whom?

Secondly, the reason this congregation's pastor is a LCMC-rostered pastor is because last month the Southeastern Iowa Synod bishop, Michael Burk, removed this pastor from the ELCA clergy roster. (see HERE )


TOPICS: Apologetics; General Discusssion; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: elca; lcmc; lutheran

1 posted on 04/28/2012 11:16:00 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lightman; SmithL; Honorary Serb; hinckley buzzard

The bright side: calumny aside, St. Mark’s is free from Apostasy Central.


2 posted on 04/28/2012 11:18:33 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Uh huh, but I heard “Merry Christmas and happy Ramadan” from the ELCA pulpit.


3 posted on 04/28/2012 11:49:10 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Should we be surprised by the ELCA anymore-—the synod that promotes apostasy.


4 posted on 04/28/2012 11:59:57 AM PDT by BlessedMom92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie; Aeronaut; aliquando; AlternateViewpoint; AnalogReigns; Archie Bunker on steroids; ...


Lutheran (EL C S*A) Ping!

* as of August 19, AD 2009, a liberal protestant SECT, not part of the holy, catholic and apostolic CHURCH.

Alleluia! Christ is Risen!

5 posted on 04/28/2012 12:11:13 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Vol. 6, SERMON LXXV, “ON SCHISM”, pp. 452-453

“That there might be no schism in the body.” 1 Corinthians 12:25.

I know God has committed to me a dispensation of the gospel; yea, and my own salvation depends upon preaching it: “Woe is me if I preach not the gospel.” If then I could not remain in the Church without; omitting this, without desisting from preaching the gospel I should be under a necessity of separating from it, or losing my own soul. In like manner, if I could not continue united to any smaller society, Church, or body of Christians, without committing sin, without lying and hypocrisy, without preaching to others doctrines which I did not myself believe, I should be under an absolute necessity of separating from that society. And in all these cases the sin of separations with all the evils consequent upon it, would not lie upon me, but upon those who constrained me to make that separation, by requiring of me such terms of communion as I could not in conscience comply with.

But, setting aside this case, suppose the Church or society to which I am now united does not require me to do anything which the Scripture forbids, or to omit anything which the Scripture enjoins, it is then my indispensable duty to continue therein. And if I separate from it without any such necessity, I am justly chargeable (whether I foresaw them or not) with all the evils consequent upon that separation.

— John Wesley


6 posted on 04/28/2012 12:12:32 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
The LCMC has been in existence for over a decade.

The NALC has been in existence for just over a year; during that time its first Bishop, Paull Spring, has openly courted congregations contemplating leaving the ELCA.

I have no love for the ELCA, having left there a little over a year ago; however, I believe that Bishop Spring’s behavior is an egregious breach of ecclesial good order.

7 posted on 04/28/2012 12:17:03 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lightman

The RCC (Roman Catholic Church) has been in existence for nearly 2000 years, and finds it amusing when several Lutheran denominations point fingers at each other and accuse the others of being “schismatic sects”


8 posted on 04/28/2012 1:28:08 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Exactly what I was thinking...


9 posted on 04/28/2012 2:04:31 PM PDT by sojourner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lightman; BillyBoy

I heard that ELCA stands for Every Liberal Cultural Agenda.


10 posted on 04/28/2012 2:12:23 PM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lightman
I notice that ELCA had no problem with congregations "dual-rostered" with the LCMC until after the homosexual Putsch in 2009 fuelled the exodus of congregations. Now all of a sudden this is verboten. Speaks volumes.
11 posted on 04/28/2012 2:13:47 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins
E xtremely
L ibertine
C ult of
A ntinomianism

12 posted on 04/28/2012 7:26:22 PM PDT by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
Uh huh, but I heard “Merry Christmas and happy Ramadan” from the ELCA pulpit.

Not too surprising in today's whatver-floats-your-theological-boat ELCA.

13 posted on 04/30/2012 4:46:50 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I am confused. To be schismatic, there must a schism, which is defined as “a formal division within, or separation from, a church or religious body over some doctrinal difference.”

To have the ELCA use the term, there must be some doctrinal difference. Yet, for the life of me, I did not know the ELCA had any doctrines left. I thought it believed in “ do your own thing.”


14 posted on 05/01/2012 9:44:10 AM PDT by superdad (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: superdad
Yet, for the life of me, I did not know the ELCA had any doctrines left.

Bless my soul, this one made my day!

15 posted on 05/01/2012 9:48:56 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: superdad
Yet, for the life of me, I did not know the ELCA had any doctrines left.

Bless my soul, this one made my day!

16 posted on 05/01/2012 9:49:14 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: superdad
To have the ELCA use the term, there must be some doctrinal difference. Yet, for the life of me, I did not know the ELCA had any doctrines left. I thought it believed in “ do your own thing.”

The expanded ELCA "foundation": "Do your own thing . . . unless it's a wholly Biblical thing, in which case you're legalistic, judgmental, homophobic, schismatic, unloving, repressive, [insert other pejorative adjectives here]."

17 posted on 05/03/2012 2:54:51 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson