You're asserting that you can prove the Earth is 10,000 years old by excluding any evidence that it isn't. Not exactly rocket surgery, there.
No, I just pointed out the inconsistencies that many researchers have uncovered over the past several decades with your treasured radio-isotope dating ~ it is not accurate.
That’s strange because I included a reference to your Ur dating reference but you are the one choosing to exclude these many varied other references that contradict your evolutionary timeframe.
Typical liberal defense mechanism - accuse your opponent of doing that which you are doing in spades.