[bronxville]

“The Vatican is ecclesiastical Babylon; The ‘woman’ clothed in scarlet and purple, riding the beast; you bet its in for a shake-up.”

I thought you had removed the comment and just now noticed it was still in evidence. I supplied the ugly site from whence the posters information was derived, and feel justified in requesting the post be removed since it came from a FR banned site, as my previous post depicted.

[Religion Moderator]

There is no indication the sentences were excerpted from a banned website. Speculations about who or what is the "Whore of Babylon" occur in many documents and webpages. I am aware of one reference which is part of a religion's doctrine and would include both Catholicism and Protestantism.

This is an "open" thread in the Religion Forum where Freepers may post for or against dieties, beliefs, etc. They may ridicule and they may be offensive. It is in a "town square" format.

[editor-surveyor]

Hello Mr. control freak!

Your comments say you are here to defeat the truth of God, and therefore he will defeat you, lest you abandon this serpent-inspired quest.
.

[Rashputin]

If the nitwit who posted the article didn't want exactly the sort of anti-Catholic slanders and flame bait that's being posted it would have been, at the very least, marked Ecumenical or better still, Catholic Caucus.

If the initiator of a given thread doesn't care enough to spend the extra few seconds it takes to label their post in a way that avoids the flame bait then they are as eager to see the anti-Catholic lies and slanders posted as they are to see the article distributed. JMHO