Hey! Hold on there a second buddy. Those statements which you are trying to characterize as what I offered as "history", were in answer to a question YOU asked, as to "what difference would it have made" concerning the reasons behind the slaughters, and what declarations were made at the time by Menendez concerning the same.
It made a difference at the time, being it was as I said. Europeans both Catholic and Protestant were appalled when details of the goings-on reached them.
Wikipedia is hardly "all historical accounts"
I never said that they were, yet even with only grabbing from that convenient source, it's far better than than what you yourself bring in establishing points key to your "version of truth" which is by and large sophistry and opinion, backed by wind.
I'm not sure where you get the impression that I'm your buddy.
Those statements which you are trying to characterize as what I offered as "history", were in answer to a question YOU asked
Some people just can't help themselves when asked rhetorical questions.
I never said that they were, yet even with only grabbing from that convenient source, it's far better than than what you yourself bring in establishing points key to your "version of truth" which is by and large sophistry and opinion, backed by wind.
It's not my "version of the turth". I avoid using Wikipedia as a source of history. However, this "wind" is from your "convenient source" which you have proclaimed as far better than what I've used:
Jean Ribault took his fleet south to pursue Menéndez on September 10. Learning that the majority of the French men at arms were gone from Fort Caroline, Menéndez ordered his infantrymen to march 40 miles north to Fort Caroline, during a hurricane. On 20 September, the Spanish captured the now lightly defended French settlement; 140 men were immediately put to death. In the eyes of the king of Spain, the acts of piracy committed by former residents of Fort Caroline made the entire settlement a dangerous nest of pirates and heretics.