To say it the way you, BlueDragon, do, is to have the Huguenots of that day be allowed to wipe their bloody hands on their victims and say “we are not responsible in the least for what we do, including murder, because Jesus loves us, and made us elite Brahmins but He can’t stand these people who dared to openly oppose our religious/political system called Calvinism”
My comment concerning "bloody hands" was speaking directly and solely to that very incident, and none other.
You said "they started it" pointing to an exact point which you claim they did so. Were any other than Huguenots injured or killed THERE, at that precise juncture?
At that point, those particular Huguenots had not harmed anyone that I know of.
Now later, back and forth provocation and bitter retribution went back and forth for quite some years. I never have pretended it did not. But it continually seems as if you believe I did, or was attempting to? Good GOD it is SO difficult to communicate with hyper-sensitive hyper-defensive Catholics on this forum!
Sometimes, I don't know why I bother, but I sure-as -shooting see why so many other freepers (Catholic & non-Catholic alike) give this ghetto a wide berth.