Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos

“I mean, it’s nice to say “the Bible and the divinity of Christ”, but, then does that mean a, say non-Trinitarian group can be SBC? “

No. When their position was made known, they would be forced out, as have several homosexual tolerant congregations.

The statements in the link below are not binding in the sense that not all congregations accept them. Many congregations reject any idea of a doctrinal statement. However, congregations rejecting the Trinity, or saying homosexuals can marry, would not last long in the SBC.

Conversely, any member congregation can leave at any time. The SBC exists to provide common support for missions and seminaries.

http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfmcomparison.asp


51 posted on 07/09/2012 7:24:24 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberalism: "Ex faslo quodlibet" - from falseness, anything follows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
But how would you technically "force them out" if they still say "the Bible and the divinity of Christ"?

The Orthodox would maintain that if you innovate from Orthodoxy, your parish gets tossed out, but the Baptists don't have orthodoxy. So how? seriously

52 posted on 07/09/2012 7:40:14 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers; Cronos

No. When their position was made known, they would be forced out, as have several homosexual tolerant congregations.

The statements in the link below are not binding in the sense that not all congregations accept them. Many congregations reject any idea of a doctrinal statement. However, congregations rejecting the Trinity, or saying homosexuals can marry, would not last long in the SBC.

Conversely, any member congregation can leave at any time. The SBC exists to provide common support for missions and seminaries.

http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfmcomparison.asp

EXACTLY. And you have asked “how”, Cronos. The SBC would not accept the funds that were sent to it by the church and would refuse to seat their messengers at the convention. They would, in effect, be ousted from the association.


57 posted on 07/09/2012 8:48:26 AM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson