Well, MHG, I'm NOT "naive" about your past posts:
1. Here you are, MHGinTN, commenting on Sept. 24, 2007 in a RELIGION thread on a NON-Romney thread...in fact, almost hijacking colorcountry's thread in a Romneyfied direction (yours was only the SECOND post of the thread)...as Colorcountry's comment in post #1 neither mentioned Romney...nor did the thread content itself: "Can have people intimately familiar with the Mormonism heresies telling others the truth now can they! We’ve seen here at FR how the dissembling and deceit runs deep within Mormonism. It will be too easy for the dnc goons to destroy Romney over Mormonism, so the Pubbies cannot afford to nominate that man.
Source: Post #2 Mormon ousted as an apostate [Religion section]
Why was it "OK" for you to bring Romney into the picture of pure "religion" thread in 2007...but now I am somehow "out of bounds" in doing it?
2. I don't even have to go back to '07, MHG. Here you are on Feb. 3, 2012 stating on a RELIGION thread (post #7) stating:
Milt will never be the President. If the establishment pubbies elect the two-faced abortionist, the media will make the LDS porpaganda ads (’And I’m A Mormon’) trying to make MormonISM attractive look like the greatest campaign of evil ever devised. And all the media whoredom need do is keep hammering on the actual things taught in that faux-christianity religion. ... Which is of course yet another very sound reason to vote for Newt Gingrich, warts and all, rather than destroy the comity of this nation over a MormonISM tantrum to get elected president
Source: Post#7, Meet Mitt Romney’s cousin (Uh-oh!) [Religion section]
3. Back in December 2007...
December 6 2007 to be exact...you claimed it wasn't simply us placing the focus more on Mormonism (than his liberal history)...but Mitt Romney himself! You said: "Squeal about posts like the one previous to mine demanding replay of doctrine for discussion and someone might, MIGHT think you were being genuine. Is Mitty’s strategy to make his Mormonism cult more a focal point than his liberal history finally wearing on your Mitt supporters?"
Source: Romney takes leap of faith with religion speech
Now indeed this last one was in the News-Activism section...but still...twas one of those common intersection threads ("faith" stuff being talked about on news section; and "politics" stuff being discussed in the religion forum...because, the world isn't as neatly "compartmentalized" as you would now like to dictate to everybody).
MHG, I found the above all in a quick 10 minutes' search...and I'm sure I could find DOZENS (if not HUNDREDS) of your past comments about Romney on RELIGION threads...Do you want me to do that and list them for you -- and the world -- to see?
What, MHGinTN? Have you had a "de-conversion?"
And worse...not only have you had a likely "de-conversion" -- but ya know...I can understand a FREEPER who simply "changes his mind" about his previous positions...
...that indeed happens...
...but for you to then to go and REPEATEDLY RAIL on others -- as you have now done on about three threads -- for something that you yourself have repeatedly done posting-wise...with no acknowledgment about that...
...Well, the above is the mark of two-faced hypocrisy...to the nth degree...
I quite simply challenge you to repent before the Lord thy God.
I have known and lived with Mormons for years and I am not a Mormon, but the are very good law abiding taxpayers and not Muslim.
How telling, that you collect past posts to use, out of context, to promote this use of the religion forum in order to continuing your purposed attacks on the politician. Are you under the mistaken notion that you are respected for this misuse of the Freerepublic religion forum and ardent hatred of Mitt Romney? I must have pricked your conscience at leats a little bit for you to spend such energy to search out sentences which you can take out of context and use to try and defend your brazen politican attacks using the religion forum. Enjoy yourself, if you can. You are failing miserably at trying to open Mormon eyes tot he heresies inherent in that cult, and I think you know that, so it appears that you have a hidden agenda, of attacking Romney. It certainly comes across that way.