Posted on 08/31/2012 12:47:28 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
>When asked what he had learned from his years of studying the Bible, the great Swiss Reformed theologian of grace Karl Barth responded, “Jesus loves me, this I know, for the Bible tells me so.” The title of Tullian Tchividjian’s award-winning book, Jesus+Nothing=Everything, offers in similar Barthian fashion a reminder that the Christian faith is not a worldview, political philosophy, social program, or a family values agenda. It is belief in the promises of God fulfilled in the Word of God, Jesus Christ. Tullian is the grandson of Billy Graham and Senior Pastor at Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church in Fort Lauderdale, Florida (founded by Dr. D. James Kennedy). He also happens to be my boss.
Jesus+Nothing=Everything (JNE) is based on Tullian’s sermon series on Colossians, in which Paul affirms that Jesus is the Son of God, the creator of the cosmos and creator of new life. JNE offers no privatized, reductive, fundamentalist approach to the Christian faith that shrinks from social participation and cultural engagement while obsessing about personal moral renovation offered by a Jesus that lives in the heart and guides moral actions. Rather, it offers a robust Nicene and Reformational Christianity wrought from the conviction that Jesus is our redeemer because he is our creator. “For by him all things were created…all things were created through and for him. And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together” (Col. 1: 16-17). This is the Christ of the creeds, the Christ that is, as St. Maximus the Confessor called him, “the cosmic mystery.”
As the Redeemer, Jesus is also, as Martin Luther discovered, the Justifier. But justification is not merely a doctrine. It is, as Luther came to understand, a basic existential and ontological reality. In fact, in his “Disputation Concerning Man” (1536), Luther argued that Paul’s statement in Romans that we are “justified by faith” (Rom 3: 28) defines the human being. Human beings crave justification, and as forgetful and idolatrous creatures, we look everywhere but to Christ for that justification. As Oswald Bayer argues, “The theme of justification is not one special theme, such that there might be other themes alongside it. It embraces the totality. All reality is involved in the justification debate” (Living by Faith, 9).
JNE reaffirms the robust Reformational understanding of Jesus as the Righteousness of God for us, the fulfillment of the promises of God to be with us and to make us his people. Contra medieval church teaching, these are promises God makes and promises he fulfills outside us (extra nos). The only thing we contribute to the situation is our sinful unrighteousness. An important part of this Reformational understanding is that God speaks to us in two words, law and gospel. The former reveals our unrighteousness and the latter, which is God’s ever last word, pronounces us righteous through the righteousness of God, which is Jesus. Tullian follows Luther when he observed, “when I discovered the law was one thing and the gospel another, then I broke through.”
Because the human person’s incapability to contribute anything to salvation (even our faith is a gift, generated by God’s grace), JNE follows the Reformational teaching that it opens up social participation and cultural engagement in unexpected ways. This is the “Everything” that JNE celebrates. Released from the burden to justify ourselves in the face of God, we are free to love our neighbor, free to use our talents, gifts, and resources in the social, cultural, and political realms.
A theology of culture emerges, therefore, in the space opened up by Christ’s work for us, not through the law, but through freedom, through grace, where work can occur for the other, for the common good, and for cultural renewal for their own sakes. The law kills, but the spirit gives life. Tullian follows Luther’s insight that the presence of law in the world is written on our hearts, and so it is always our default position. It is grace that is counter-intuitive, disruptive, distinctively uncommon and alien. Grace also undermines all systems of metaphysics, philosophies, and worldviews, especially so-called “Christian” ones. JNE tears open a space for a cultural theology that is sensitive to how grace wrecks havoc in the world of art, culture, and society. A JNE theology of culture revitalizes and deepens involvement in culture as freedom and gift, not as duty or obligation.
Most evangelical Christian worldview thinking is dominated by law, not gospel, by God’s first not his last word. It sets up philosophical, aesthetic, social, and political parameters to guard the Christian or offers a way for a Christian to “engage” (re: defend himself against) culture. But JNE reminds evangelicals that grace cannot be controlled and it cannot be cooperated with. It can only be responded to, and it produces freedom. It is grace, not law, that is remaking the world. It is, as Aslan calls it, a “deeper magic,” even if that magic is not immediately obvious to us.
JNE affirms, following Luther, that because our justification is in Christ, not in our work, we are free, free to see Christ everywhere and in everything, for he is in, as Paul writes in Colossians, “all things.” And that opens up the world to the Christian as pure gift, especially the world of art, literature, and music—those endeavors with no “practical” use and “pragmatic” outcomes that have long troubled evangelicals. It also releases the Christian of the burden of protecting, guarding, and defending the Kingdom of God through law and the devices of the old Adam, through political action, presuming it to be the only legitimate form of Christian cultural participation. JNE creates space for Christian cultural life to be something other and more than defensive. It becomes grace-filled and grace-sensitive. It also creates space for a church, like Coral Ridge, to hire an art historian.
And so I am pleased to pursue my vocation as a Jesus+Nothing=Everything cultural theologian.
Because the human person’s incapability to contribute anything to salvation (even our faith is a gift, generated by God’s grace), JNE follows the Reformational teaching that it opens up social participation and cultural engagement in unexpected ways. This is the “Everything” that JNE celebrates. Released from the burden to justify ourselves in the face of God, we are free to love our neighbor, free to use our talents, gifts, and resources in the social, cultural, and political realms....
....Most evangelical Christian worldview thinking is dominated by law, not gospel, by God’s first not his last word. It sets up philosophical, aesthetic, social, and political parameters to guard the Christian or offers a way for a Christian to “engage” (re: defend himself against) culture. But JNE reminds evangelicals that grace cannot be controlled and it cannot be cooperated with. It can only be responded to, and it produces freedom. It is grace, not law, that is remaking the world. It is, as Aslan calls it, a “deeper magic,” even if that magic is not immediately obvious to us.
JNE affirms, following Luther, that because our justification is in Christ, not in our work, we are free, free to see Christ everywhere and in everything, for he is in, as Paul writes in Colossians, “all things.” And that opens up the world to the Christian as pure gift, especially the world of art, literature, and music—those endeavors with no “practical” use and “pragmatic” outcomes that have long troubled evangelicals. It also releases the Christian of the burden of protecting, guarding, and defending the Kingdom of God through law and the devices of the old Adam, through political action, presuming it to be the only legitimate form of Christian cultural participation. JNE creates space for Christian cultural life to be something other and more than defensive. It becomes grace-filled and grace-sensitive.
It’s not clear if JNE follows the neo-orthodoxy of Barth, but if it does then I would perhaps encourage Tullian to take a more substantial approach to the Scriptures. It does not “become the Word of God”, but rather IS the Word of God.
However, it does certainly lead to the discovery of the tutorial role of the Law and the overwhelming, blinding, rescue of grace...if one is among the elect.
Thanks for the post.
The "simplicity that is in Christ" is fully realized ONLY by grace. There are those who want to, or think they NEED to, complicate the gospel of grace because they find trusting God to work within the individual believer in His own time and His own way too unsettling. Religious edicts and mandatory behaviors are invented, not from Scriptural traditions, but motivated from within the insecure and fearful musings and thoughts of those who presume they alone CAN direct individuals sanctification.
The old adage, "Let go and let God", was discarded as ineffectual and, in its place, a rationale of the necessity of "cooperating" with grace to be saved was substituted. But, instead of believing in the power of the Holy Spirit to effect change internally and maturing the believer, the outside was "cleaned up" and "corporal works of mercy" were mandated to make the new convert deserving of heaven. Of course, the list of mandated behaviors grew to a sizable list and which included total submission to all that the "church" deemed was necessary for salvation. Instead of a Christian being assured of eternal life through his faith, the very idea of assurance of salvation was called the "sin of presumption", because nobody, according to this hierarchy, could possibly know what his state of grace at the moment of death would be. He could only hope he had confessed all his mortal sins - recently - and had partaken of the Eucharist and been obedient and, and, and... The absolute BEST one could hope for was a short stint in a place of suffering where all the "temporal" punishments for non-mortal sins were purged from his soul making him ready for heaven.
What this man-made false gospel essentially did was negate grace. It pushed grace to the side and placed the onus for suitability for heaven on the person and his merit, depending on his own worthiness to be saved. But grace is all about getting what we DON'T deserve. Mercy is not getting what we DO deserve - which is eternity separated from God because of sin. Grace is wholly undeserved, unmerited and unearned and we ARE redeemed from the punishment of all our sins by the precious blood of Christ - which is the price of sin. Only by blood is there atonement.
We can never fully fathom the depths of God's grace. What a wonderful, marvelous, amazing God we serve!
Amen!
(Hebrews 4:10,11) For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief....Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent (John 6:29)
By "our" in the law written on our hearts does Luther mean Christians, non-Christian, or both?
Romans 2:14-15
(Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law,
they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law.
They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness,
and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.