To: SeekAndFind
In 2003, this lady wrote “The Gospel of Mary of Magdela: Jesus and the First Woman Apostle”. She now says she has her proof. Actually, she has a piece of papyrus, the name Jesus, the words wife and disciple in a small paragraph. No one knows the provenance of the papyrus and it is estimated to have been written 300-400 years after Jesus lived. Newspaper’s are now running with the story Jesus was married. No matter what you believe, this is “proof” of nothing and a Harvard Ph.D. should know not to present it as such. (I am a woman so no, I am not anti-woman.)
To: MacMattico; xzins; P-Marlowe; wmfights; cripplecreek; greyfoxx39; kabar; SoConPubbie; ...
In 2003, this lady wrote The Gospel of Mary of Magdela: Jesus and the First Woman Apostle. She now says she has her proof. Actually, she has a piece of papyrus, the name Jesus, the words wife and disciple in a small paragraph. No one knows the provenance of the papyrus and it is estimated to have been written 300-400 years after Jesus lived. Newspapers are now running with the story Jesus was married. No matter what you believe, this is proof of nothing and a Harvard Ph.D. should know not to present it as such. (I am a woman so no, I am not anti-woman.)
This right here tells you all you need to know.
This woman has a history of spreading heresys.
98 posted on
09/20/2012 6:44:42 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson