‘She was formerly married herself.’ I do not recall any prohibition against divorce in the Protestant churches.... How much of this has to do with that terrific film, 2012, and Obama and his ilk trying to do D’S in? The timing is very interesting.
Denesh got the old heave ho, while Dems can sail on through all kind of marital misdeeds (e.g. Bill Clinton)
This is probably White House orchestrated over the great movie 2016 and the book The Roots of Obama’s Rage
I hope the guy can secure a job. Maybe Romney’s press secretary?
Of all people, Dinesh should have seen this coming. Reminds me of Stupid Newt and the ethics charges.
Just another hit piece because of his movie it’s a Saul Alinsky move.
“Besides, relationships ‘on the rebound’ are usually ill-fated, because they are typically a way to avoid dealing with the failings that caused the previous relationship to break up, leaving those unaddressed failings free to rear their ugly head again at a later time.”
Being Catholic, I don’t accept the legitimacy of divorce. But putting that aside, this article seems to be missing something important:
1. It has been reported elsewhere that Mr. D’Souza’s marriage was on the rocks for some time when he took the job at King’s College in 2010. I believe that they actually physically separated at that time. I believe that Mrs. D’Souza didn’t come out to New York to live with Mr. D’Souza as he undertook his new job.
2. It is his wife, Dixie, who didn’t want to reconcile.
3. This marriage, apparently, has been over and done for quite some time, and the parties are only now getting around to tying up the loose ends, legally.
Thus, the above-quoted paragraph is particularly egregious, in that Mr. D’Souza has likely worked through many of the issues that led to the “failure” of his marriage. He has been separated (if not legally, at least in fact) for roughly two years. This isn’t quite the classic case of a “rebound relationship.”
Now, if only they had a soiled cigar and blue dress...
All would be poo-poo’d as ‘nothing to see here...’
Oh yeah, I forgot, he needed that ‘D’ also!
seeing as the protestant faiths have no rules against divorce, and the divorce proceedings themselves are between the couple and the STATE... I’m confused as to where the problem lies?