In the election of 2012, Obama was the MOST pro-abortion, anti-Catholic candidate. Voting for the most pro-abortion candidate in an election is what I MEAN by the term “pro-abortion.”
It might be what you mean but on it's face, your headline says that these men are "pro-abortion". You have no idea whether or not that is the case and therefore your headline is entirely misleading. Sorry.
All you know is that they didn't vote for Romney. Period.
Is it really necessary to say that among those who voted for Obama (and I'm talking generally, not only seminarians) there will be a continuum of subjects from, at one extreme, those for whom free access to abortion is the pre-eminent issue to those at the other extreme, for whom abortion is simply not an important issue at all such that their vote is determined by other economic/cultural/political considerations?
The former can truly be classified as "pro-abortion." The latter, simply as "asleep at the wheel".