“Whatever religion you profess I am glad that I am not a member of it because I am a Christian and my God is a loving God.”
What we were discussing is whether the Cardinal said what he apparently said that you do not wish to acknowledge.
Now that it is multiply sourced, you take the false “It’s for the children” high-road after having been caught misleading in debate.
When will your Clintonian deception end?
We aren’t talking about the worth of souls, we are talking about whether the Cardinal appears to value the souls of Gaza’s children over Israel’s. That appears to be the case based on his statements. THAT should disturb you, but that you choose to ignore the error of the Cardinal who is of your faith, and excuse his unequal treatment of God’s children shows that both you and the Cardinal do not really understand the faith to which you both belong.
You top it off by denigrating the faith of someone who seeks only honest debate.
Good job.
No one has denied that the Cardinal made a reference to the Slaughter of the Innocents by Herod or that the loss felt by those mothers is not any different than that felt by mothers in the Gaza over the loss of their children. What is being discussed is the acceptance that those remarks accuse Israel of being "Baby-Killers". Thre slight of hand being attempted when the anti-Catholicism in play became embarrassingly obvious was the deflection to an argument over whether the Cardinal actually made the comment that was misrepresented. Any presumption that the Cardinal, the Church or any Catholic for that matter, holds Israel's children less dear than those in the Gaza is specious.
As for denigrating the faith of anyone I only look for evidence of Fruit of the Holy to determine if there is faith. Where it is absent so too is the Holy Spirit and faith. I see precious little in your posts and the posts of the anti-Catholics.