The article about his earlier plagiarism is here.
But look, he gets 300 posts in response to his exaggerations, fabrications, and provocations, so I guess it pays off.
Amongst the back-and forth engaged in on this thread concerning Meotti's article, can be seen evidence for individuals [not particularly you] from either "side" of the discussion dragging their own prejudices & pride into the mix, over-stating their own case in manner not completely unlike Meotti's methods, sans the plagiarism?