[muawiyah]

The whole thing hinges on the policy ~ if you are an employer, you pay part, the employee pays part, might even be the gub'mnt pays part ~ but WHICH part. It's not possible to disaggregate insurance. The government's argument will be it's prepaid medical ~ not actually insurance, so it can be disaggregated ~ and the government buys 'this part' ~ the government will also be making the argument that you can't actually disagregate it by sex because ...... or race ..... or whatever. They'll lose on those points, and next thing you know you, as a man, or an elderly woman, or a young chil' will no longer need to pay a share of some young woman's 10 abortions per year! And if you're an employer, corporate or otherwise, you can exclude what you want lest one of your employees be offended handling the paperwork for those 10 abortions, or 5 vasectomies, or genital mutilations.

I think Roberts thought this all out, saw the ultimate weak point in any federal mandate, and laid a landmine field for them all. Plus, the ultimate problem for ObamaKKKare is the year the government is ruled by a single faction that decides it doesn't want to pay for any of this ~ just cuts off the funds right down to IRS agents' salaries to enforce rules, ~ and suddenly everybody's back to 1944 and serious rationing.

[annieokie]

if you are an employer, you pay part,""""....

The employer can/may opt out and pay a penalty anyway.

"You pay part", so opt out of your part being an objector under some of these new court rulings. the employee then can purchase his own insurance if wanted. The employer can pass the portion of benefit $$$ to the employee that they have earned anyway.

Not sure if I am getting this expressed like I want. Still clinging to hope for a Citizens out.

I think what I am trying to boil it down to, is to flood the Courts with continual lawsuits based on some objection or another.